That prompted me to ask in the comments:
"Can you explain why being a staunch supporter of Mitch Johnson is a plus in your book?"To which an anonymous commenter on behalf of Yes! replied:
"Roch: We do not agree with you and your cronies about Mitch Johnson and you damn well know it. We have a long body of work, thousands of words, stating our reasons. Feel free to hit our archives."If you are looking for thoughtless immaturity as a guide for your voting decisions, Yes! is for you.
Funny how the weekly "alternative" paper endorses the tired old good ole boys and race baiters. The fact that they feel DBS has actually contributed anything of value greatly discredits their views.
ReplyDeleteI skimmed through but threw the paper down after I couldn't find Dan Fischer's name anywhere in the paper. I did see Coad's, Hester's, and Kee's. Maybe I didn't look hard enough. If that's the case, my bad.
ReplyDelete--Brandon Burgess
Brandon: Yes, your bad. We endorsed both Nettie Coad and Jim Kee in the D-2 primary.
ReplyDeleteBelieve it or not, though, we didn't take your reaction into consideration when we deliberated.
And I hope you threw the paper down into a recycling bin and not onto the street.
"Believe it or not, though, we didn't take your reaction into consideration when we deliberated."
ReplyDelete--And that is your bad. You lost one reader and your advertisers lost one potential customer.
After weeks of lauditory articles on Jorge Cornell, I was somewhat surprised to see that YES! did not endorse the gang leader, er, convicted felon, er community organizer/head of some kind of group.
ReplyDeleteSurely YES! has the courage of its convictions, correct? Hello? Buehler?