Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts

Thursday, September 17, 2015

"Echo Chamber of Delusion, Paranoia and Racism”

GREENSBORO, NC -- The Greensboro Police Department announced today a partnership, short on specifics, with Nextdoor.com, the closed social site/app that requires users to sign up with their real names and provide their verified address.

Out of the currently 123 reviews of Nextdoor.com on Site Jabber, 99 give it one star out of five. Here are some of the most notable, good and bad:
Every person "who looks out of place" walking on the sidewalk gets called out on the app. God help you if you're black and knocking on doors in our neighborhood.
----
I signed up for this service because it was recommended by the city that we live in for traffic alerts, street closings, etc. I signed up for the service, began to browse for vital information in my city, and only then found out that this website publishes your entire personal information for everyone in the community to see without divulging this to users before the sign up. Considering we pay for a non-published phone number and address, I was pretty upset to find all of my private information listed. I deactivated my account, and only then did I look for complaints about the company. Boy was I surprised to see the complaints on here.
---
The best thing is I feel cool after expressing my opinion there, about environment and things. That's why I don't read free local paper any more.
---
The app sends "push notifications" for urgent alerts tagged as "Crime & Safety". This means that every bored, stupid Desperate Housewife who gins up a fantasy of danger now has the ability to push her stupid blather straight to your cell phone.
---
I highly recommend this medium, it is a great resource to share emergency news (ie.: missing pets, bears in the neighborhood, theft alerts, odd jobs, yard sales, free stuff, block parties, etc.). A neighborhood is safer when its residents care and keep an active neighborhood watch.
---
home to politically correct extremists...
---
Continue to be re-registered by either the company or site lead. Have unsubscribed and quit the stupid site three different times only find NEW bat-$#*! crazy posts from "neighbors" I don't know. Ironically, it keeps signing me up for neighborhood I don't even live in. There must be some sort of con / grift going on whereby the company is trying to pump up its user numbers.
---

If you like trying to communicate with brain dead idiots this is the website for you.
---
This organization sounds like it is run like a Junior High popularity club.
---
Nothing has caused more hard feelings between neighbors in my community than Nextdoor.
---
This works beautifully. Obviously it depends on the type of neighbors you have, but I have found NextDoor to be a life saver many times.
---
I've found this site to be used only to judge and provide nasty comments about neighbors, and not helpful at all. 
---
I also love it because the Police Department can post urgent messages to those neighborhoods under their jurisdiction.
---
Complete scam. How do I know ? Postal mail has return addresses of non-existent people in our own neighborhood saying we are "invited" to join. Getting them weekly now with fake return addresses claiming to be from neighbors. So folks, nothing free is any good. They are up to something. Pretty sure it will end badly for the investors....
---
I feel that in this day and age if you need an app to communicate with your neighbors, instead of going and rining their doorbell, then maybe you should just stay inside.
---
What it is is simply a means to locally share information and get to know your neighbors. As with all things that involve people, things can go wrong quickly if people aren't respecting each other and treating each other with kindness and understanding.
  ---
if you are a upscale tight ass this site is for you.



Monday, July 14, 2014

Four great Greensboro law domain names for sale

For sale or lease, collectively or individually, four great search engine-boosting domain names for attorney or law practice.

greensboro-criminal-lawyer.com   
greensboro-dwi-lawyer.com  
greensboro-speeding-ticket-lawyer.com   
greensboro-traffic-ticket-lawyer.com

Send inquiries to admin@altmedia101.com.

Monday, June 09, 2014

For local elected officials (and the News & Record)

GREENSBORO, NC -- To our local elected officials who insist on planting their online presence exclusively on Facebook (usually with a mandatory log in, no less): I'm sure the ability to be able to "block" people who ask inconvenient questions has its appeal, but you should think about what the guy in this video has to say and the implications of requiring your constituents to use Facebook as the online conduit to you.

What are you asking us to acquiesce to to be able to connect with you? This applies too to the News & Record too, who not only requires a FB log in to post comments, but requires that users accept the FB tracking cookie just to be able to even see comments.

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Security vulnerabilities: City's fixed, News & Record's still broken

GREENSBORO -- A quick update on the security vulnerabilities of some local websites reported by this blogger previously. The City of Greensboro has corrected theirs (kudos!). The News & Record has not  (it figures). Their Ad Express still has the security flaw.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Four great greensboro law domain names for sale

For sale or lease, collectively or individually, four great search engine-boosting domain names for attorney or law practice.

greensboro-criminal-lawyer.com   
greensboro-dwi-lawyer.com  
greensboro-speeding-ticket-lawyer.com   
greensboro-traffic-ticket-lawyer.com

Send inquiries to admin@altmedia101.com.

Sunday, April 13, 2014

More fact avoidance at the News & Record

GREENSBORO, NC -- The News & Record features, from time to time, "Ask a reporter," in which people submit questions and a reporter answers them... or not. As I was just writing yesterday, the News & Record and, by extension, Greensboro, suffers from a preference to rely on the pronouncements of authorities instead of its own research. Today's "Ask a reporter" is another such example.

A reader asks for the number of traffic accidents within a half a mile of the intersection of Pleasant Garden Road and Liberty Road. Reporter Joe Gamm begins his reply with " We don’t have specific data on accidents at that intersection" and proceeds, in typical fashion, to turn to a spokesperson for a less than precise characterization.

Whatever Gamm meant by "we don't have specific data," the fact is the specific data is readily available online at the City of Greensboro police department's website, with the ability to provide exactly the kind of information the reader asked for, right down to the half mile radius. One would think the News & Record's crime reporter would be aware of this.

It turns out, with five minutes of effort, I was able to determine a precise data-specific answer to the reader's question.

Accidents within a half mile of the intersection of Pleasant Garden Road and Liberty Road
------------------------

Past 12 months: 21

April, 2013: 0
May, 2013: 2
June, 2013: 1
July, 2013: 4
August, 2013: 1
September, 2013: 1
October, 2013: 4
November, 2013: 3
December, 2013: 2
January, 2014: 0
February, 2104: 0
March, 2014: 3

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

An open letter to Greensboro's mayor

Dear Mayor Vaughan,

I hope you are enjoying your time as mayor. Just a few months in and you and your colleagues have tackled some big issues. From the cheap seats, it looks like you are doing a pretty good job (I really appreciated your willingness to engage a speaker from the floor at the last meeting who had questions about the performing arts center deal — you were respectful and knowledgeable, as was he, and that exchange addressed some important matters. It was a refreshing change from the curt and arrogant dismissals of your predecessor.)

Remember when you had just been elected and I made you aware of the giant Chinese electronics manufacturer Foxconn's announcement of its intentions to open two new manufacturing plants in the United States—one east and one west—and suggested that you should take the initiative to personally, as mayor, begin a dialogue with Foxconn to recruit them here? You replied that you intended to do as much as you could to recruit new industry to our city.

There is news today of another economic opportunity that could benefit greatly our fair city, news that should, once again, motivate you to take on the role of Greensboro's ambassador and personally act on our behalf. RST fiber, a North Carolina company, has announced it has activated a new super fast internet backbone in the state. It intends to provide internet and other broadband services to rural and urban customers.

I know nothing about this company, nothing about their capabilities and reputation, but we can get to that later. Today, you should call the CEO of RST, his name is Dan Limerick, tell him what a great market Greensboro would be for his company's services and invite him to begin an exploration of how to bring his broadband to Greensboro with you as a personal liaison between him and Greensboro's government.

You could tell him of Greensboro's long dissatisfaction with Time Warner Cable's price gouging, how, with TWC about to be taken over by Comcast (two companies that consistently both rank near the bottom of customer service surveys) it is sure to create even greater demand for an alternative in this market where TWC is the only broadband provider, how Greensboro demonstrated great exuberance for Google fiber, how our 110,000 households and broad range of industries will all make an excellent market for RST and that we should be at the top of his list.

Now, I'm sure there will be people waving you off of this idea with the caution that this is just not how it's done, that there are certain protocols and experts in economic recruitment at your disposal who can work up a proper pitch involving the eleven county greater piedmont triad conglomeration of sticksvilles, hicksvilles and backwater boonies but, in the words of the late great George Harrison, "F*** all that."

For now, today, let's have Greensboro — yes Greensboro, our city, not the nebulous "region" — get its foot in the door, first, prominently and personally, for a change.

Will you do that for us?

Cordially,
Roch

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Greensboro's off-limits mayor

GREENSBORO, NC -- Why does Mayor of Greensboro Nancy Vaughan post her commentary on city government behind a mandatory Facebook login? I'd like to read what the mayor has to say about possible criminal actions of city staff in improperly executing a contract awarding a $750,000 loan to the International Civil Rights Museum -- especially after the Mayor recently voted to approve raises for the City staff utlimatley responsible: Former City Manager Denise Turner-Roth and City Attorney Mujeeb Shah-Kahn.

I can't read the mayor's commentary though, because, like 60% of Americans, I don't use Facebook and the mayor's online communications are exclusive to Facebook.

Madam Mayor, we're interested in what you have to say. How about saying it on the public side of Facebook's walls?

(Same question for you, Councilman Tony Wilkins.)

Monday, August 05, 2013

Zack Matheny adds profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com

GREENSBORO, NC -- Zack Matheny, incumbent candidate for Greensboro City Council district 3, has added his profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com.

Matheny is 40, works as as an entrepreneur and is registered as Republican. He says his three top issues are economic development, public safety and fiscal responsibility.

In answer to what he has done, specifically, to increase transparency in city government, he says, "Over my years on council I have gotten closed meetings taped so at sometime they can be released for public and I have argued for meetings to be open to all. I am accessible and open with all topics. "

Yvonne Johnson adds profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com

GREENSBORO, NC -- Yvonne Johnson, incumbent candidate for Greensboro City Council at-large, has added her profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com.

Johnson is 70, works as a non-profit executive director and is registered as Democratic. She says her three top issues are jobs & economic development, quality of life and improving public transportation.

In answer to what she has done, specifically, to increase transparency in city government, she says, "I have always tried to provide vital information when asked. Unless there is a personnel issue, I answer questions and share information. "

Monday, July 29, 2013

Chis Lawyer adds profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com

GREENSBORO, NC -- Chris Lawyer, candidate for Greensboro City Council at-large, has added his profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com.

Chris, 34, is a physician's assistant and registered as a Republican. His three top issues are budgets, business/jobs and public safety/infrastructure. In answer to what he would do, specifically, to increase transparency in city government, he said, "there must be full disclosure at all times."

This is Chris' second run for council. He ran at-large in 2011, finishing fourth in a race for three seats, just out of the money by 762 votes or 1.5% of the votes cast.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Sale Leone adds profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com

GREENSBORO, NC -- Sal Leone, candidate for Greensboro City Council district 5, has added his profile to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com.

Leone is 41, works in law enforcement and is registered as a Democrat. He says that his three top issues are the people, poverty and unemployment.

He did not answer the question about what he would do to increase transparency in city government.

City Manager confirms unequal treatment for candidates

GREENSBORO, NC -- Greensboro City Manager Denise Turner Roth announced last week that the city will be posting the records requests made by city council challengers, but not incumbents, to a special webpage on the city's website. Today, she confirms that this will apply only to challengers and that incumbents will not have their requests posted:
"Consistent with the way this has been conducted in the past, we will not list incumbent-requested items on the web-site with items requested by candidates unless otherwise directed by Council."
-- Denise Turner Roth, City Manager
The last time something like this was attempted, city council responded by voting not to have  an information sharing policy. It was then-council-person, now-mayor, Robbie Perkins who made a motion that council abandon the scheme. It passed 8-1, with T. Dianne Bellamy Small as the lone no vote.

Watch the video as city council takes action in response to now-candidate, at-large, Ben Holder:



Unless and until this policy is changed, the obvious solution for council challengers is to use an unidentifiable email address to make requests. The law does not demand that one identify oneself when requesting or receiving records.

-----

UPDATE: District 3 representative Zack Matheny, who joined Perkins in rejecting the previous sharing scheme, weighs in:
"We have to continue to do our jobs.  Being a Current Elected Official and being a candidate is not the same. For example, the way you present this would also imply that being a candidate would mean being able to attend Closed session meetings to discuss Personal Employment Issues, and you know that is not the case.

"I understand and support your fight for Public Records and traditionally support your arguments, this one however, is difficult to support."
Of course, whether or not to post the records requests of all candidates online or only the challengers has nothing to do with the limited situations prescribed by law where council may meet in closed session.

Monday, July 22, 2013

GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com returns

GREENSBORO, NC -- I have fired up GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com again for the 2013 municipal elections. The site provides information provided by the candidates about them and their campaigns. It is the number-one result of a Google search for Greensboro city council candidates.

I have sent invitations to all the candidates for whom I could find contact information to add their information for free.

A surprising number of candidates have no contact information available online, meaning I haven't been able to notify them. So if you have a favorite who you want to help make sure the voters get to know, please tell him or her to add their information to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com.

It's official: News & Record untrusted

GREENSBORO, NC -- A screenshot of today's News & Record website:

"This Connection is Untrusted"

The News & Record needs to flip its organizational model. The job of the editor, at least as it was traditionally known and which the N&R continues to try to impose on its operation, is of less significance now than is the job of those who can expertly deploy, maintain and develop new ideas for computational journalism in service to reporters (i.e. computer assisted reporting.)

Ask yourself, who is more important, the guy who decides what's going to go where in the paper or the guy or gal who understands how to electronically link reporter and audience in fresh and creative ways, avoiding the likes of above?

Monday, May 20, 2013

News & Record website comments limited to schmucks

GREENSBORO, NC -- The updated News & Record website (currently offline) requires users to be tracked by Facebook to write or view comments.

I won't get into an explanation of why you should care; either you are fine with third parties monitoring your internet activity or you object. Those of us who prefer not to have our clicks and views monitored, recorded and compiled; those of us who prefer not to have the information, news and entertainment we access assembled into a consumer dossier; those of us who prefer not to have our faces recognized and, without our knowledge or consent, linked to profiles of the most intimate details of our lives, well, such folks abound and we take some simple steps to diminish such tracking.

For many, securing some control over our information begins with simply setting our web browsers to block third party cookies. Some of us take even stronger measures, installing quick and easy add-ons to our web browsers that put further restrictions on tracking and monitoring technologies (Ghostery, Do Not Track Me).

As you might imagine, one of the most egregious and prolific collectors of personal data online is Facebook. (This Is How Facebook Is Tracking Your Internet Activity -- Business Insider)

With the recent update to the News & Record's website (down at the moment), people who have taken such privacy measures cannot comment on the News & Record's stories, blog posts or letters. Worse though, we cannot even view comments—not unless we allow the installation of Facebook's tracking mechanisms. One must allow tracking by Facebook not only to write comments but even just to read comments on the News & Record's website. Block Facebook's monitoring and comments are invisible.

I understand why the News & Record did this. In an environment where an organization has no imagination or ability for technology (they appear to have dismissed everybody with actual web tech skills), the N&R has consigned itself to being purely an end user of technology—they are not facilitators, innovators or inventors—and, as such, they are at the mercy of the requirements of whatever off-the-shelf solutions they deploy. In this case, their chosen solution limits the ability to write and view comments to schmucks.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Our shitty newspaper

GREENSBORO, NC -- I know it's not polite, but polite words don't suffice. Our local newspaper is crap. I mean a real steaming pile of shit with a few decent little nuggets of undigested corn here and there, but who wants to pick through the preponderant feces to find them? Sorry, but it's true.

For the second time in six months, and the third time in five years, the News & Record has made links to their archives—stories, blog posts, letters and comments—permanently inoperable and undiscoverable.

Links to News & Record stories from local blogs, search engines and Wikipedia are now all dead and offer only a "Page not found" error.

Articles linked to by the websites of downtown boosters, economic promoters, the City of Greensboro — all dead.

It makes us look bad — again — as if we are some backwater of ineptitude (We aren't, are we?) And that's without consideration of the News & Record's plethora of uncorrected errors, fabricated quotations, intentional misinformation and character assassination.

Another thing: I'm tired of people saying how much they "looooooove" Greensboro and how this is such a fabulous place while they have nothing to say about the decay of our institutions. If you really LOVE Greensboro, speak up. You don't coddle something you love while it chokes to death on its own vomit.

Tuesday, March 05, 2013

Clueless

From Jeff Martin at his Second Sun blog regarding Greensboro's entrenched old school and downtown:
"These are men used to relying on secretaries to achieve public communication and often falter when left to themselves. They don’t read blogs, text or do Facebook. In short, they don’t really have a clue anymore."
He has a little something for City Council too:
"Here’s an example of the downtown mindset from the city: It wasn’t enough to simply allow street musicians to busk at leisure. No, they had to be treated like homeless people: forced to purchase a license from the city. The last time I was in Seattle, musicians were paid by the city to show up at a pre-ordained place and time to perform for the throngs of people.

"So, shake up DGI, but let’s not forget that city staff and council have behaved like a bunch of jerks."
UPDATE: A commenter asks if an ordinance was passed requiring street musicians to get a permit. It was. It requires a fee and a background check. Here's an excerpt from the minutes of the council meeting:
Police Attorney Jim Clark summarized the ordinance amendment; and made the following PowerPoint presentation:

• Limited to certain locations within City
– Elm Street- from Lee Street to W. Lindsay Street
– Greene Street- from Smothers Place to W. Lindsay Street
– Davie Street- from Washington Street to W. Lindsay Street
– Church Street- from Washington Street to W. Lindsay Street
– Washington Street- from Edgeworth Street to Church Street
– Commerce Place
• Listing will be available in the Clerk’s Office and online
• Require a permit and background check
• Payment of an annual $10.00 tax- privilege license
• Licenses are available for individuals or groups
• Limit the number of performers to no more than 5 performers at one location
• Must stay at least 100 feet from outdoor seating or dining areas and at least 75 feet from all other street performers
• Not allow for performance on residential property, or private property without the owner’s consent
• Not remain at one location for a total duration of no more than four hours during a single day
• Limit the hours between 11am and 11pm
• Special Events are exempted from this ordinance
• Provide regulations for
– No blocking of sidewalks or entrances
– No selling of goods or other services
– No use of fire, sharp instruments, aerosols, firearms, dangerous weapons or harmful chemicals
– Adhere to City’s noise ordinance
– May use small self-powered amplifier
– No obscene language or gestures
– Cannot incite a riot
– Cannot interfere with special events
– Cannot connect to electrical or water for performance
– Incorporates focus group changes from public
And here is how the vote went down:
Councilmember Vaughan made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Kee; the ordinance was adopted on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Abuzuaiter, Bellamy-Small, Hoffmann, Johnson, Kee, Matheny, Perkins and Vaughan. Noes: Wilkins.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Excuse me, I Twarted™*

Why do people share things on the Internet? Is it because they have made, thought or captured something truly worth sharing or is it because sharing something— anything—no matter how insignificant or meaningless, makes one feel significant?

It's not that I think everything should be some masterwork of creative genius. The Tweets that tell us Justin Bieber changed your life are not terrible really (they remind us, in few words, of the power of music and the optimism of youth), but intentionally degraded photos without any subject or sense of composition, cell phone video that sounds like it's coming from some not-tuned-in A.M. radio station playing through the blown speakers of a 1972 Gremlin, vapid statements of the obvious and thirteen minutes of "and then...", "and then...", "and then..." telling us about your day, starting with, "So I woke up," are just drivel.

If you're posting such twaddle, is it because you are unable to recognize or create quality or is it because you are so insecure that the point is not what you post, but to post anything in a desperate hope that you won't be insignificant?

* Twart: A Tweet or other social media post as welcomed and interesting as the emission of bodily gas.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...