Tuesday, November 29, 2011

WFMY regurgitates press release

GREENSBORO, NC -- WFMY publishes a story to their website about a new medical facility in Caswell County. Although identified as "Written by WFMY News 2," nearly all of it is copied word-for-word from a press release. It matters because, at their most basic, news organizations play a vital role as fact checkers. Regurgitating the self-interested self-promotions of businesses is not the role of a legitimate news organization. (Copied work also says something about the standards and rigor of the news organization.)

Here is the WFMY article with the copied portions highlighted:
Yanceyville, NC-- Cancer patients in in Caswell County no longer have to make road trips to other towns.

Monday, Alamance Regional announced Convenient [sic*] access to cancer care is now available to residents of Caswell County and the surrounding area. Through a partnership between Alamance Regional Medical Center and Caswell Family Medical Center,  Alamance Regional's Cancer Center was selected by the medical practice to provide high-quality care to the area.

A recent community needs assessment determined access to specialists is a major health issue in Caswell County.

Based on the findings of the needs assessment, Caswell Family Medical Center expanded to offer additional services in the Caswell County area.

The clinic is located in Caswell Family Medical Center on Highway 158 in Yanceyville. It is staffed by board-certified oncologist Timothy Finnegan, MD, and Krissy Carr, NP, both with Alamance Regional Cancer Center, and is open to patients with appointments on Tuesday afternoons.

The clinic provides oncology appointments and some chemotherapy treatment services. Patients who need extensive chemotherapy will receive treatment at Alamance Regional Cancer Center Mebane. Radiation therapy treatments are provided at the main Alamance Regional Cancer Center in Burlington.

For more information or to make an appointment, call Alamance Regional Cancer Center Mebane at 919-563-1160.
 * The capitalization begins a sentence in the original.

WFMY Plagiarism

Update (12/06/11): WFMY has changed the byline, now attributing the story to CNN.

GREENSBORO, NC -- WFMY publishes an article to their website titled "Experts: Beware Of Germs During Holiday Shopping." Although the article is identified as "Written by Lauren Melvin" of WFMY, the vast majority of it is copied, word-for-word, from the original source.

Here is the WFMY article, the highlighted portions were copied:
Greensboro, NC -- When you head out to do your holiday shopping, you're thinking about the people on your list, the stores you're going to, and your budget.  However, experts warn you should also be thinking about germs.
According to Health.comwhile you're checking items off your shopping list, you may be exposing yourself to germs like flu viruses, E. coli, and staph.  All of them could make you sick.

Health.com had a panel of experts to rank the worst germ hot spots at your local shopping center.
1. Restroom sinks
The filthiest area in a restroom (and therefore in the whole mall) isn't the toilet handle or the doorknob -- it's the sink, our experts say.  Bacteria, including E. coli, fester on the faucet and handles because people touch those surfaces right after using the toilet, explains panelist Charles Gerba, Ph.D., a professor of environmental microbiology at the University of Arizona.
"The sink area is a moist environment, so bacteria can survive longer there," he adds.
Watch out for soap dispensers, too -- not only are they handled by many dirty hands, but the soap itself may harbor germs. When Gerba's team tested liquid soap from refillable dispensers in public bathrooms, they found that one in four contained unsafe levels of bacteria.
Protect yourself: Wash your hands thoroughly after using a public loo: Lather with soap for at least 20 seconds, then rinse well. Use a paper towel to turn off the water and open the door. If there's no soap or paper towels, kill germs with an alcohol-based hand sanitizer, using at least a tablespoon of product.
Gerba also advises avoiding refillable soap dispensers (usually made of clear plastic with a removable lid) and only using liquid soap that comes in a sealed refill; if that's not an option or you're not sure, follow up with hand sanitizer.
2. Food court tables
Even if you see the table being wiped down, that doesn't mean it's clean, says panelist Elaine Larson, Ph.D., a professor of epidemiology at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University: "The rags themselves can actually spread harmful bacteria such as E. coli if they are not changed and washed regularly."
Protect yourself: Consider stashing a pack of hard-surface disinfecting wipes in your purse so you can swipe the table before you sit down.
3. Escalator handrails
"In our testing, we have found food, E. coli, urine, mucus, feces, and blood on escalator handrails," says Gerba. "And where there is mucus, you may also find cold and flu viruses."
Protect yourself: Play it safe: Avoid touching handrails altogether, recommends Gerba, unless you absolutely have to -- in which case, give yourself a generous squirt of hand sanitizer afterward.
4. ATM keypads
After testing 38 ATMs in downtown Taipei, Chinese researchers found that each key contained an average of 1,200 germs, including illness-inducing microbes like E. coli and cold and flu viruses, Philip Tierno, Ph.D., director of clinical microbiology and immunology at New York University Langone Medical Center said.  The worst key of all? The "enter" button, because everyone has to touch it, Gerba points out.
Protect yourself: "Knuckle" ATM buttons -- you'll avoid getting germs on your fingertips, which are more likely to find their way to your nose and mouth than your knuckles. And be sure to wash your hands or use sanitizer afterward.
5. Toy stores
Toy stores can actually be germier than play areas, carousels, and other kid-friendly zones, Tierno said, simply because of the way little ones behave there. "Kids lick toys, roll them on their heads, and rub them on their faces, and all that leaves a plethora of germs on the toys," he says. The goods their parents don't buy end up back on the shelves, where your kid finds them.
Protect yourself: If you make a purchase, wipe down any toy that isn't in a sealed box or package with soap and water, alcohol, or vinegar (which has antimicrobial properties) before giving it to your child. And, of course, reach for the hand sanitizer after you've been hands-on in the toy aisle.
6. Fitting rooms
You won't pick up much from the hooks or the chair. The germ culprit? What you try on.

"After people try on clothing, skin cells and perspiration can accumulate on the inside," said Tierno. "Both can serve as food for bacterial growth." You can even pick up antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), just by trying on clothes, says Tierno.
Protect yourself: Always wear full-coverage underwear (no thongs!) when trying on clothes, especially pants, bathing suits, and any other garment that touches your genitals or rectum. Bandage cuts or scrapes before trying on clothes, as "open wounds can be a gateway to dangerous bacteria," Tierno says. And be sure to wash new clothes before you wear them.
7. Gadget shops
While you're playing around on that new smartphone, you could be picking up germs from the thousand people who tested it out before you. "Most stores do clean their equipment," said Tierno, "but they certainly don't clean after each use."
A study published last year in the Journal of Applied Microbiology found that viruses easily transfer between glass surfaces (think iPad or smartphone faces) and fingertips. And a recent report found that of four iPads swabbed in two Apple stores located in New York City, one contained Staphylococcus aureus, the most common cause of staph infections, while another registered a bacteria associated with skin rash. That's not even counting the cold and flu germs that might be lurking.
Protect yourself: Before you try out the latest gizmo, quickly wipe it down with a disinfecting wipe. And (yes, once again) use a hand sanitizer after you're done.
8. Makeup samples
Heading to the makeup counter? You might end up picking up a staph infection right along with the latest lipstick shade. A 2005 study found that between 67% and 100% of makeup-counter testers were contaminated with bacteria, including staph, strep, and E. coli. "This study shows us that someone was sick or went to the bathroom, didn't wash their hands, and then stuck their finger in the sample," Tierno said.
Protect yourself: "Avoid using public makeup samples to apply cosmetics to your lips, eyes, or face," said Tierno, who suggests asking for a single-use unit (you open it, try it, and throw it away). If that's not available, use a tissue to wipe off the sample and then apply the product to the back of your hand.
The best line of defense: Buy then try. Returning stuff to the store may be a little more of a hassle, but it's a heck of a lot better than bringing home a nasty bug.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

For my Republican friends

It has become so commonplace with local conservative bloggers and commenters that I no longer push back, but their propensity to assert opinions untethered from the facts is long established. It's not just local. Republican David Frum has a great article about how this fantasy paradigm must end or sink the Republican party in "When did the G.O.P. lose touch with reality?"
Backed by their own wing of the book-publishing industry and supported by think tanks that increasingly function as public-relations agencies, conservatives have built a whole alternative knowledge system, with its own facts, its own history, its own laws of economics.

Friday, November 18, 2011

3 years smoke free

I have not had a cigarette for three years (as of yesterday, actually).

I quit with the help of Chantix, no side effects other than a gradual disappearing of the desire for a smoke until I simply did not want the next cigarette. In my case, I was on it for longer than suggested before quiting and stayed on it for longer than suggested after I quit, but it worked.

Smokers get sick more often, illnesses are more severe and you'll probably die sooner than if you did not smoke with the likelihood that you will live the last part of your life in some diminished condition as a burden to your loved ones. But you know this already.

I know that a life without cigarettes can be unfathomable to a smoker, even the next fifteen minutes can seem impossible. But I was there and now I'm not, not for three years. You can escape too. If you smoke and want to quit, talk to your doctor.

Social media smackdown

From a funny and knowledgeable article about social media:
Social networks exist to sell you crap. The icky feeling you get when your friend starts to talk to you about Amway, or when you spot someone passing out business cards at a birthday party, is the entire driving force behind a site like Facebook.
Because their collection methods are kind of primitive, these sites have to coax you into doing as much of your social interaction as possible while logged in, so they can see it. It's as if an ad agency built a nationwide chain of pubs and night clubs in the hopes that people would spend all their time there, rigging the place with microphones and cameras to keep abreast of the latest trends (and staffing it, of course, with that Mormon bartender).
We're used to talking about how disturbing this in the context of privacy, but it's worth pointing out how weirdly unsocial it is, too. How are you supposed to feel at home when you know a place is full of one-way mirrors?
We have a name for the kind of person who collects a detailed, permanent dossier on everyone they interact with, with the intent of using it to manipulate others for personal advantage - we call that person a sociopath. And both Google and Facebook have gone deep into stalker territory with their attempts to track our every action. Even if you have faith in their good intentions, you feel misgivings about stepping into the elaborate shrine they've built to document your entire online life.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Rhino falsehood

John Hammer in the Rhino Times:
"But it is hard to see how an all-black group that endorses candidates who pay a fee for the endorsement and sends its endorsements to voters in predominantly black precincts is ending divisiveness."
Hammer was referring to the Simkins PAC, but the assertion that candidates pay for its endorsements is false. Of the nine candidates reported by John Hammer in the Rhino Times to have received the PAC endorsement in 2009, five made a contribution to the PAC. Clearly candidates are endorsed with and without making contributions to the PAC.

John Hammer did not respond to requests for clarification.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Wrong foot

GREENSBORO, NC -- Acknowledged: With three newspapers well attuned to local government and a determined corp of citizen journalists, Greensboro is the kind of town where politicians put themselves in peril when they argue a position founded on misrepresentations.

Thus Mayor Elect Robbie Perkins is starting off on the wrong foot when he premises his approach to the landfill on what Triadwatch says is a dead wrong assertion. There may be good reasons for Perkin's preference for a regional solution for trash disposal, but Triadwatch says one of those reasons is not, as Perkins asserted, that neighboring High Point will exhaust their landfill in five years. A High Point official says it's 25 years.

Please, Mr. Mayor Elect, keep your facts straight and don't blow smoke. It won't work here.

Friday, November 11, 2011

Latest N&R circulation: Sundays up, weekdays continue to slide

GREENSBORO, NC -- For the second six-month period in a row, the News & Record's Sunday print circulation increased, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations—up by 845 over the previous year. Weekday circulation continues to decline, down by 4,585 in a year.

Sunday: 86,932
6 month change: +0.5%  (+467)
12 month change:  +1.0% (+845)

Weekday: 57,489
6 month change:  -5.7% (-3,444)
12 month change:  -7.4% (-4,585)

N&R Circulation (in thousands)

In 2005, the N&R's weekday circulation was 95,119 and Sunday was 112,154, representing declines to-date of 40 percent and 22 percent respectively.

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Leaving something on the table

GREENSBORO, NC -- I got some advice, from whom I do not remember, when running for office: "Don't leave anything on the table." Sometimes you win an election at the margins, so the moderate efforts can be as important as the major: Don't leave anything on the table.

348 votes separated the candidates in district 4 in yesterday's municipal election.

Between the municipal primary and the close of the polls yesterday, 1,698 absolute unique visitors viewed GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com. 80 percent of those visitors came from search engines where the top search term was "greensboro city council candidates."

799 of the unique visitors were in the 48 hours immediately prior to the close of the polls. These were people who were trying to decide who to vote for.

Why some candidates declined multiple invitations to add their information to GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com at no charge or cavalierly left their information incomplete, I do not understand.

Tuesday, November 08, 2011

"Humility and vision;" couldn't have said it better myself

Ed Cone:
GSO now has a very different City Council. Let's hope they approach the job with some humility and vision, and that they don't confuse the emphatic ouster of their predecessors as a rejection of fiscal responsibility.

Local election guide: GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com

GREENSBORO, NC -- Today is election day. You can find candidate profiles, election news and links to candidate websites at GreensboroCouncilCandidates.com.

Monday, November 07, 2011

Improper campaign contributions in city council races

GREENSBORO, NC -- From the North Carolina Board of Elections:
It is unlawful for any corporation, business entity, labor union, professional association, or insurance company to directly or indirectly contribute to a candidate. This includes donating items to committees for fundraisers and sponsoring holes at golf tournaments. Political committees not registered with North Carolina are also prohibited from contributing.
That seems pretty straightforward to me. No companies. No unions. No unregistered PACs. So, unless I'm missing something, it seems as if the following recent contributions to city council candidates are prohibited.

Marikay Abuzuaiter - at large
$250 from Drive Committee, Washington, DC (The Teamsters' PAC)

Nancy Hoffman - district 4
$250 from Drive Committee , Washington, DC (The Teamsters' PAC)

Yvonne Johnson - at large
$500 from Drive Committee, Washington, NC (The Teamsters' PAC)
$1,000 from RRA Local Candidate Funding (not found as a registered PAC within the state)

Bill Knight
$1,000 from the Sharp Pencil PAC, Dulles, VA (not found as a registered PAC within the state)

Robbie Perkins
$200 from Linder Ventures, LLC.

Please sir, may I have no more?

GREENSBORO -- Acts attributed to unnamed sources, the passive voice where the "who" is missing and oversimplifications—in an age of stiff competition for quality information, why does the N&R offer this gruel? (emphasis added)

Some political strategists have advocated that residents vote for one or two candidates to ensure a particular ideology rules the council.

Some political insiders
have debated asking Abraham, the sixth-place finisher in the primary, to step aside to ensure that Abuzuaiter gets the third seat to tip the council in a liberal direction.

The same suggestion has been made to newcomer Lawyer, who beat fellow conservative Thompson in the primary and is in competition for the third council seat.

All the partisanship — which has permeated the current City Council — doesn’t sit well with some members of the community and with some candidates.

Thompson's official actions contradict campaign video

GREENSBORO, NC -- Thanks to David Hoggard for bringing yet another city council representative Danny Thompson deception to our attention.

Friday, November 04, 2011

Speak freely


GREENSBORO, NC -- At last night's Guilford County Commissioner's meeting, Chairman Skip Alston cut off the microphone as George Hartzam was speaking from the floor after previously interrupting Hartzman to ask him to keep his comments on the agenda topic. Prior to the regular public meeting, the commissioners held a special meeting, where they voted to prohibit the showing of video by speakers form the floor. (A motion to outlaw dancing was continued to the next meeting.)


[Hartzman begins at the 2:25 mark, but the the preceding oration is eloquent and worth hearing.]

These clampdowns on free speech are concerning. I wrote to County Attorney Mark Payne and asked what was going on. Regarding Chairman Alston limiting Hartzman, Payne told me (entire answer below):
"The legal standards for public hearing comments is that they are to be on topic and comments outside the scope of the hearing or redundant can be limited."
Apparently, the mayor also gaveled down Hartzman at a city council meeting earlier this week for the same reason, not speaking to the topic. I don't know what Hartzman's motives are for making his presentations, verbal and written, so obtuse; but even if one might have thought Hartzman was eventually going to make a point on topic, the Chairman did not and he exercised his prerogative. 

Here's the important thing though. There is a safeguard against an arbitrary or tyrannical abuse of this prerogative by the Chair.  A speaker who finds himself in this situation can make an appeal to any other commissioner to make a motion to allow the speaker to continue. With a second and a majority vote, the Chair will be overruled and the speaker will be allowed to continue. The Chair doesn't need a vote to cut a speaker off, but an affirmative vote will allow the speaker to continue. 

If the Chair (or mayor) is trying to cut you off in a way you think is unfair, don't appeal to the county attorney, as Hartzman did, or other staff, see if you can get some friendly help from a representative on the dais. If the Chair is reaching for the microphone kill switch, you won't have much time, so have something quick at the ready. Like:
"Is there a commissioner who will move that I be allowed to continue?" 
Mark Payne's reply (in majority):
"As to the limitations on the comments of Mr. Hartzman, as you know, those comments were made as part of a public hearing on the county's proposed schedules of value, which provides the guidelines for tax evaluation procedures.  The legal standards for public hearing comments is that they are to be on topic and comments outside the scope of the hearing or redundant can be limited.  The chair has the authority to call the comments of a speaker out of order; minus a motion, second and vote on the question otherwise, the chair's decision stands. A vote is not required. Finally, i do believe that the comments were, in fact, well outside the topics of the revaluation methodologies being proposed by the tax department.  George's comments began as a general statement of the need for a revaluation and the housing market in general; then he stated his opinion that adjusting real property taxes upward to the revenue neutral position was preferable to using sales tax as an option.  While these comments were more to taxation decisions not to be made until the budget is adopted and a tax rate is established before July rather than the schedule of values, they were arguably related to the topic.  The next comments went to the parties were had advocated the 1/4 cent sales tax in the past and their possible motivations for doing so. Past decisions by other parties on the 1/4 cent sales tax, in my opinion, is clearly not related to the schedule of values.

"As you may have notice George asked me as to the legality of the ruling; it is not appropriate  for me to engage any speaker, i should only speak to and on behalf on the board.  The board had no question for me and so i was not in a position to speak. If is had been asked i would have said roughly what is in this email."
.

Strip club operator gives $500 to Danny Thompson's campaign

Greensboro city council representative Danny Thompson of porn fightin' fame, accepted a $500 campaign contribution from a local strip club operator in September (here, p. 9).

As noted by a commenter on Joe Guarino's blog, according to state ABC records, the contributor is the manager of the company that holds the liquor license for the strip club Copa Rocka Cantina.

(Secretary of State records list the contributor as president of the company.)

Agreeing with John Hammer on Danny Thompson

GREENSBORO, NC -- Rhinoceros Times editor John Hammer, in explaining why he is not endorsing incumbent city council representative Danny Thompson for city council.
[S]ome things are more important than a candidate's political stance, and for me one of those is honesty. 
I agree. To Hammer's list of particulars for Danny Thompson's dishonesty, I would add a few of my own.

Porn Hype Part I
Thompson misrepresents the content of documents.

At an August, 2010 council meeting Danny waived a thick stack of papers he said were six months of incident reports from the central library. He falsely claimed that the "great majority of them" were reports of "indecent behavior to looking at inappropriate websites."

Thompson used this "information" to justify making a motion: that "We institute blocking software devices on our public library computers whereby access is denied and not able to be accessed." (sic) (video, 01:48:50)

A subsequent records request and examination by this blogger revealed that of the 190 reports Thompson was waiving around, only 21 were for viewing inappropriate websites. Nonetheless, Thompson's stunt kicked off months of time-wasting hullabaloo over a problem that wasn't a problem.

Bonus for lack of accountability
I sent Thompson an email asking him to clarify what he had represented the documents to be. Receiving no reply, I sent it again, twice to his personal email address and twice to his city email address. He never answered.

Lowest Cost Trash Provider
Thompson misrepresents vendor bids

Thompson promoted council's selection of Gate City Waste Services to collect the city's trash saying, on multiple occasions, that the company was the lowest cost provider. It was not. Thompson even said as much immediately prior to voting to award the contract to what he acknowledged, in his own words, was the second-lowest bidder. Thompson subsequently tried to reconcile his self-contradictions by "explaining" that the company would have been the lowest bidder under a low-trash-volume scenario—one that did not conform to the city's needs. For the job of actually disposing of the city's trash, the company selected was the second-lowest bidder.
 
Bonus for lack of common sense
Six days before the final vote to award the trash disposal contract to the second-lowest bidder, Thompson accepted a $2,500 campaign contribution from one of the company's partners.

Quoting The Rhino Times out of Context
Thompson misrepresents the meaning of a John Hammer report

On his campaign website, under the title of "What others are saying," Thompson offers a two-word snippet from the Rhino Times:
"...refreshingly honest." -Rhino Times, August 4, 2011
Here's it is in context:
As Thompson kept saying, it is an election year. But it is still rare for a politician to admit that they cast a vote mainly because they thought it would help their campaign. One way to look at it is that Thompson is refreshingly honest. He kept repeating that he had received lots of emails from Greensboro residents and the farmers who were upset about the farmers' market all lived outside the city.

Bonus for prevarication by neglect
Also on Thompson's "What others are saying" web page is a quote from David Hoggard praising Danny for his position on which management group to select for the Farmer's Market. This week, Thompson did an about face and officially voted against Hoggard's position, but David's quote remains as if it still applies.

Porn Hype Part II
Thompson misrepresents this blogger's research.

Trying to bring some clarity to the library computer porn scare, I wrote a blog post explaining why a single web page will generate multiple "hits" in computer log files and that such hits do not equal websites. After explaining the terminology, I referred to the 500 hits flagged as porn in a sample library log file and wrote: 
"It should be comprehensible to the rational mind that these are not 500 'visits' or even 'pages.'...It shows why it is disingenuous to report these items as counting 'porn site visits.'"
At the next council meeting, Thompson referred to this blogger's research and, in characterizing it,  announced:
"I understand there were about 500 inappropriate or pornographic websites..."
...the very misrepresentation I specifically advised against. I've got to hand it to Danny, citing someone as an authority for the opposite of what they really said is very clever. Political judo—if you think it's all a game.

Like Jeff Martin, I'm not sure if Thompson is dishonest because he's not too smart or if he thinks he's smarter than the rest of us. The reason doesn't matter, he is incapable of meeting one of the most important obligations of his office and should be turned out.

More trash company campaign contribution stink

GREENSBORO, NC -- (Hat tip: Triadwatch) I like Greensboro city council representative Mary Rakestraw. She has always been thoughtfully interested in issues of concern to me even though I do not live in her district. She leans conservative but, as an unaffiliated moderate, I can appreciate her presence on council as part of a good mix that keeps the ship from listing too far in either direction. She isn't a slave to ideology. She'll think for herself as evidenced by her break with the conservative block last year in voting for the sensible approach to handling the "porn problem" on library computers. While she was wrong to give us the runaround about where her redistricting proposal came from, overall, she does a good job worthy of respect.

But this stinks:

Rakestraw received a $500 campaign contribution from D.H. Griffin while city council was in the process of considering Griffin's company for the city's trash disposal contract.

Rakestraw did not report the contribution of August 24th on her campaign report for the reporting period ending August 30th where it would have been known to the public as council headed into the final stretch of awarding the trash contract. Instead, she reported the contribution on her next campaign report, filed on October 3rd, after the landfill issue had been decided.

There were a few other inconsequential contributions to Rakestraw's campaign around the time of the Griffin contribution that were also not reported with the first report, so I don't think this was an intentional effort to hide anything; slow communications with her campaign treasurer at the tail end of the reporting period is plausible.

Even unintentionally, though, the public was denied full transparency on a rather important issue. One way to avoid this kind of stink would be for council members to exercise a little common sense and just not take contributions from people who have business before the city council.

RELATED: Rakestraw's pre-election finance report was due October 31st. As of 11:00 A.M. yesterday it had still not been received by the Board of Elections. It is not online this morning; more lack of transparency through neglect, unfortunately.

Thursday, November 03, 2011

City council candidates: The money

GREENSBORO, NC -- Thanks to the good folks at the Guilford County Board of Elections who, short-staffed, still managed to get the latest city council candidate campaign reports online yesterday as promised.

Here are notable items for council candidates (see the mayoral race here). These items are from the final report before Tuesday's election. They cover the period from 9/27/11 - 10/24/11
-----------------------

Wayne Abraham - at large
This candidate has not filed the pre-election report, due October 31st, as of the time of this post.

Marikay Abuzuaiter - at large
$500 from Dale Frederiksen, Replacements, Ltd.
$500 from Robert Page, Replacements, Ltd.
$250 from Drive Committee (The Teamsters' PAC)

T. Dianne Bellamy Small - district 1
$100 from the NC Realtor's PAC

Jorge Cornell - district 5
This candidate originally reported his intention to stay below the $1,000 threshold for campaign finance reporting, but yesterday reported to the Board of Elections that he has gone over that amount. The report he is now required to file will not be available until after the election.

D.J. Hardy - district 1
This candidate has not filed the pre-election report, due October 31st, as of the time of this post.

Nancy Hoffman - district 4
Hoffman's report is notable for not identifying the employer of a number of her contributors, as is required. Also notable, Hoffman's campaign is the only one with paid management, three campaign managers to boot.

Contributions:
$1,500 from Dale Frederickson, Replacements, Ltd.
$750 from Robert Page, Replacements, Ltd.
$500 from Thomas Sloan, profession and employer not listed.
$500 from Sally Cone, profession and employer not listed.
$450 from Beth Mcke-Huger, Greensboro Housing Coalition
$250 from Drive Committee (The Teamsters' PAC)

Expenditures:
$8,115, Fairway Outdoor Advertising
$589, advertising, Yes! Weekly
$3,258, campaign management, Lauren Jeffries
$2,936, campaign management, Graham Sheridan
$1,000, campaign management, Mark Bochkis
$1,470, advertising, Rhino Times
$1,000, contributor refund for amount over legal contribution limit, Frances Atherton

Bradley Hunt - district 2
This candidate has filed a pre-election report, but it is not online yet.

Yvonne Johnson - at large
Johnson's report is notable for not identifying the employer of almost all of her contributors, as is required. (One contributor's employer is laughably identified as "law firm.")

Contributions:
$500 from Robert Page, Replacements, Ltd.
$500 from Drive Committee (The Teamsters' PAC)
$1,250 from Triad Good Government PAC
$1,000 from something called RRA Local Candidate Funding, which has the same address as the N.C. Association of Realtors

Expenditures:
$2,865, Fairway Outdoor Advertising

Jim Kee - district 2
Contributions:
$200 from fellow council person Robbie Perkins
$250 from fellow council person Zack Matheny's campaign.
$500 from the NC Realtor's PAC

Chris Lawyer - at large
Expenditures:
$1,620, advertising, Rhino Times

Zack Matheny - district 3
Contributions:
$500 from Murray Kessler, president, Lorillard
$500 from Michael Shannon, attorney, Lorillard
$500 from Robert Page, Replacements, Ltd.
$500 from the NC Realtor's PAC

Expenditures:
$250, Jim Kee campaign
$2,000, outdoor advertising, Fairway
$2,900, advertising, The Rhino Times
$150.80, advertising, News & Record

Jay Ovittore- district 3
This candidate has filed a pre-election report, but it is not online yet.

Mary Rakestraw - district 4
This candidate has not filed the pre-election report, due October 31st, as of the time of this post.

Nancy Vaughan- at large
Contributions:
$1,000 from Joseph M. Bryan, Jr., Jayembe
$1,000 from William Kotis, III, Kotis Properties
$1,000 from Robert Page, Replacements, Ltd.
$1,000 from N.C. Realtor's PAC
$500 from Triad Good Government PAC

Expenditures:
$540, advertising, Greensboro Times
$409, advertising, Carolina Peacemaker

Danny Thompson - at large
Contributions:
$1,000 from William Kotis, Kotis Properties
$400 from the NC Realtor's PAC

Expenditures:
$1,470, advertising, the Rhino Times
$5,406.50, advertising, WFMY

Loans:
Candidate has loaned his campaign $5,000 and has $733 of campaign expenses outstanding on a credit card.

Trudy Wade - district 5
(Tidbit: Wade has the distinction of being the only candidate to receive a contribution from a farmer.)

Contributions:
$500 from Frank Auman, self-employed investor
$500 from David Hayes, Hayes Investments

Expenditures:
$945, advertising, the Rhino Times


Knight vs Perkins: The money

GREENSBORO, NC -- According to their campaign finance reports, through October 24th the candidates for mayor have raised and spent the following:

Bill Knight
Contributions: $32,882
Expenditures: $33,408

Robbie Perkins
Contributions: $55,235
Expenditures: $63,114

Notable items:

Bill Knight
Contributions:
$1,500 from William Kotis, III,  Kotis Restaurant Group
$1,000 from William Kotis, Jr, Kotis Properties
$500 from Congressman Howard Coble
$1,000 from the Sharp Pencil PAC

Expenditures:
$11,045, advertising, the Rhino Times
$562, Coach Mkay Companies, for presentation coaching

Robbie Perkins
Contributions:
$2,500 from N.C. Realtors' PAC
$2,000 from William Cassell, WLC, LLC
$2,000 from Robert Page, Replacements, Ltd.
$1,000 from Drive Committee (The Teamsters' PAC)
$500 from Bhependra Patel, profession and employer not reported

...and, likely illegal, a $200 contribution from a company, Linder Ventures, LLC.

Expenditures:
$3,000 to Simkins PAC, the reason for the disbursement is not reported.
$2,351, advertising, WFMY
$200 to fellow council person Jim Kee's campaign
$1,500, online ad, News & Record
$1,000, advertising, Greensboro Times
$610, advertising, The Rhino Times
$589, advertising, Yes! Weekly



Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Here we go; Guarino ginning up the bigotry.

Despicable xenophobe, bigot and desperate conservative local blogger Joe Guarino whistles the maniacs to attention ahead of next week's city election. Greensboro is a diverse and accommodating city. That's one of our strengths and a bane to Guarino who, unable to persuade through quality ideas, descends to appeals of fear and hatred. So small. So unworthy of Greensboro. Unworthy of humanity, frankly. His latest? Danger, Muslims!

Get me a rewrite!

I'm reading the first draft of the Back to the Future screenplay, the one in which Marty McFly is a pot-smoking video-bootlegger, Doc Brown has a pet monkey and there is no DeLoreon. Time travel is accomplished by a convolution of various equipment. Instead of syncing Marty's trip back to the future with the gigawat lighting strike on the clock tower, the duo scheme to tap into the energy of an above ground nuclear test.

I kid you not.

There is a lot that is familiar: Biff, some of the gags playing on the cultural, fashion and slang differences between the 1950's and the present (which is to say, 1985), mom's crush on Marty and the general plot of the young time traveler, despite Doc's warnings, intervening to assure that his parents get together.

It's strange though to read the origins of something quite familiar and find it so different from the final production.

Small unmarked bills, please.

Seriously?

City Council representative Danny Thompson accepted a $2,500 campaign contribution from a principal of Gate City Waste Services six days before council was to take a final vote on awarding a trash disposal contract to that company.

Seriously?

Election reports not online days before election

UPDATE: The Board of Elections office tells me the reports will be online sometime today.

GREENSBORO, NC -- By this time, candidates for city council and mayor will have filed their last campaign finance reports before next Tuesday's elections (due on October 31st). They are not online at the Guilford County Board of Elections website though. The online reports have not been updated in a month. I am told that the key person responsible for this has been away for a family situation.

These pre-election reports are vital. They are the public's last chance to evaluate the money influences on campaigns and candidates, a factor in voting decisions. Surely there is more than one person at the Board of Elections who knows how to put these reports online and can do so pronto.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...