They are not so good at measuring -- they are better at dissembling and shifting blame.
The firm published a nice looking report on March 17th in which they reported that Greensboro's Google Fiber Facebook group had 901 members.
That was wrong. There were over 5,300 at that time.
I posted a correction on the firm's blog, giving them the accurate number with a link to the Facebook group so they could see for themselves. That was on March 19th when, as I commented, Greensboro had over 5,300 members. Heck, as early as March 11th, Ed Cone noted that Greensboro's Facebook group had topped 4,000.
The error remain uncorrected in Steketee Grenier's "report."
Then they release an updated second report on March 25th. This one would get it right, right? Wrong. This "updated" piece of junk reported that Greensboro's Facebook group had "grown" to 2,908.
So, again, I posted a comment on their blog asking them why they got Greensboro's number wrong twice now, even after their initial error was brought to their attention.
Look at this condescending load of crap offered up as an answer:
It would be entirely plausible for any city to see a sudden swell in membership after our data was captured. In fact, this was often the case.The doofus can stick his congratulations in his upper peninsula. I'd be more concerned, were I him, with demonstrating a little integrity by acknowledging and correcting the errors -- you know, for the sake of preserving my reputation as a professional influencer.
To quote the second report: “[...]Greensboro’s significant growth in fan base from 901 to 2,908.”
Congrats on the rapid growth!




