Saturday, September 19, 2009

Local media failures a pox on Greensboro

If you have given up on reading Jerry Bledsoe's "Cops in Black and White" in the Rhinoceros Times because you think you "get it;" or, if as someone rather surprisingly told me yesterday, you have formed an opinion that it is not worth your attention without having read any of it; or if you are a local journalist who worries that you might ruin your weekend with the discomfort of facing the failures of your enterprise and colleagues, do yourself a favor and read anyway this week's chapter 85.

It is about the incredible lie perpetrated on the people of Greensboro and how the lie gained a foothold that had people and institutions become invested in perpetuating the lie, even when their professional responsibilities were to refute it.

The storytelling by our local media regarding the "black book" is the most monumental failure of Greensboro's institutions in my lifetime. Their refusal to acknowledge or correct their mistakes is the most heartbreaking disappointment this Greensboro son has seen in anything "Greensboro" since moving here in 1970.

The News & Record gave its imprimatur to fabrications, then declined to dispel the myths when new information was revealed. This failure sits on the shoulders of editor John Robinson and publisher Robin Saul. Yeah, it's rude to call people out, and I don't like how it makes me feel personally. But these decisions were not made by a building or a masthead or a company, they were made by real people who bear their responsibility.

The News & Record opinion pages called for a full and complete revelation of the truth surrounding the black book. When that truth conflicted with tales already spun, The News & Record pulled up short, its windy protestations suddenly no longer serious. The News & Record rejected substantive critiques of how it covered this issue from its opinion pages by explaining that such examinations had already been thoroughly undertaken in local blogs. These decisions were not made by a newspaper, or an editorial page, or a corporation, these decisions were made by a real person; this failure sits on the shoulders of opinion editor Allen Johnson.

Local television follows the lead of local newspapers. As long as the News & Record is complicit in letting the myth stand, WFMY gets a free pass on their continued perpetuation of the black book myth, but they should know better.

There are two serious consequences to these failures. First, Greensboro can now look forward to another generation of unnecessary racial suspicion, between the "yes it was" implications of believing the black book myths and the "no it wasn't" understanding of the truth. Let's spend another thirty years with our fingers crossed that we'll just "move on" and forget. Without a mass forgetting, subsequent legitimate charges of racism will have a harder time being taken seriously, first having to prove they are not a product of the local media "crying wolf" again.

Second, Greensboro is consigned to going forward knowing we are operating at the disadvantage of having small media that will choose concealing their own ineptitudes at the expense of pursuing the truth; that any genuine understanding of who we are as a community is in jeopardy; that any perception we think we have of ourselves, if gleaned from the media, may simply be a chimera.

We face a future almost certain to include stepping on some otherwise avoidable landmine because the institutions reponsible for shining the light on our path will extinguish the light if they find themselves poorly reflected in it. They would prefer to let us stumble through the dark rather than utter the simple but too-big-for-Greensboro words of "We made a mistake."

11 comments:

  1. You know, it would be a smart business move for the N&R to come out and tell it like it is. That would be a move that I could respect and maybe it would generate some sense of credibility that was lost looooonngg ago. But to this day, no one over there even hints that they played any kind of role. Those in charge over there obviously do not care anything about Greensboro or the well being of her citizens or community relations. If it werent for the resilience of Greensboro's people, the Wray thing could have got a lot uglier than it did/is.

    --Brandon Burgess

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of the interesting thing is that the News and Record has been relatively quiet with its advocacy journalism on this issue over the last year or so. But WFMY persists in its errant reporting. Greensboro needs to turn off WFMY.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marketing racism to our community Roch, it's what the N&R does so well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not defending the N&R, but an entire police force, not to mention a seasoned reporter, were and may continue to be influenced by one of the most energetically charismatic individuals ever to don a uniform, namely Lt. James (Hercules) Hinson. That he has never been convicted of a crime and still serves does not mean he has not done all he could to polarize this city in their opinions regarding GPD operation, the new city manager and councilmembers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting comments from your rightwing readers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Interesting comments from your rightwing (sic) readers." -- Anonymous

    Noted. Do you have any observations on the substance of the post?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Agreed. The N&R should either recant or refute what Bledsoe has written. Interestingly, Bledsoe's writings have brought only silence from those whose previous actions/writings/statements Bledsoe challenges.

    ReplyDelete
  8. WOW ! Hear, hear. That was powerful.

    Fred Gregory

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is one of the best pieces of information I have seen from you Roch. You should stick the the local issues where you can make sense without a lot of references to "context".

    That being said, WFMY is on the way down along with the N&R. Note all the firings and the dismal ratings. I for one only watch 8 or 12 for any local news. Either of them is a better choice for Greensboro even though they emphasize other areas of the Triad.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you, but "context" is just the facts that make something objectively real or not. The context in this case is the difference between a line-up book created to solve a crime or a book "shown to every prostitute and junkie in the county to get something on police officers."

    Without context one could say things like, "If you are going to have one for black people, there should be one for white people." So context is kind of important. No?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree the facts are important. The way I usually see "context" used is to allow a more subjective element enter the discussion.

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...