Thursday, October 22, 2009

Update: Proposed Greensboro sewer extension to airport

[Credit: Thanks to Greensboro Assistant City Manager Andy Scott and Water Resources' Brian Boyd for their very speedy response to my request for these maps -- hours.]

These maps (below) show the proposed extension of water and sewer lines to areas of the Piedmont Triad International Airport. (Download them if you want greater detail.)

I am certainly no expert, but from what I can tell, it appears as if these maps answer the question of whether these proposed lines would benefit private property owners. With the exception of passing by a few individual homes, it appears not -- that it is only going to be airport property that is served by these extensions. (And, for some reason, a third try at extending sewer to the new FedExHub that the city originally said would cost around $250,000).

This item was continued from Tuesday's City Council meeting. I am not sure why. Maybe councilors wanted a few more questions answered. Here are mine remaining.

  1. With any development served by these extensions being on airport property, the city will never reap any tax benefits from the properties, airport property being exempt from city taxes. Is this the best use of $4.5 million of the taxpayers' money? Maybe. Maybe not. A thoughtful consideration of costs vs. benefits including a careful consideration of opportunity costs is in order. Would $4.5 million spent elsewhere reap greater benefits if it meant development of taxable property instead of development of tax-free property?
  2. Is the cost in line? Were I on council, I would want to see documentation for every penny the city is asked to pay. With the Airport Authority as the middle-man, with Greensboro having no opportunity to control bidding or costs, we should have clear evidence that the costs are appropriate.

Greensboro Airport Sewer Extension Map (West)
Greensboro Airport Sewer Extension Map (East)

Speaking of business recruitment

Yes! Weekly reports on the issue of business recruitment and the two mayoral candidates. Speaking of which, in March, Mayor Johnson said she was going to attempt to recruit a broadband internet access competitor to Time Warner Cable. I wonder how that is coming. I haven't heard anything in the seven months since and Mayor Johnson did not answer my email inquiry about it.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Getting to know you -- or not.

Love 'em or hate 'em, Greensboro is renowned for its thriving community of local blogs. For all the many unsuccessful ways Greensboro has tried to find or fabricate an "identity" for itself, we have a genuine organic one in our preponderance of local blogs: "Blogsboro," as the L.A. Times called us. In our collection of citizens using blogs to converse, reflect, debate, inform and influence we are very unlike most other cities -- even Dayton.

[If you are aware, you can skip the next two paragraphs]
Greensboro bloggers have a significant record of investigating, organizing and reporting in ways that include not just expressions of policy-influencing opinions, but also manifestations of "real world" action ranging from organizing fundraisers to launching law suits.

Reporters know it. Politicians know it. Greensboro's smart and paying-attention know it: Greensboro blogs are a wealth of knowledge about and insight into Greensboro. You read them if you want to know what's going on in the hearts, heads and lives of Greensboro's people.
[/end skip]

So when someone brand new to town says he will not read local blogs because "I don’t have time for the noise,” my shoulder-shrugging reply is "Your loss, Mister City Manager."

Whoohoo! I won! I won! I won!

My fantasy football team's loss this week to Jeff Sykes' team is compensated by winning this week's GreensboroSports.com CiCi's Pizza NFL Picks Contest. I picked ten right and four wrong.

It's easy to play, just watch for the entry announcement each week at GreensboroSports.com, then post your picks. Thanks to the guys at GreensboroSports.com for the pizza,  I think I'll see if I can make a date of it with my nephew.

Um, make that $4,582,000

With some help from Keith Brown at Triad Watch, I found the attachments to tonight's city council meeting that describe in greater detail the grants the city is contemplating giving to the airport authority for extension of city water and sewer lines.

The total is $4,582,000.00.

Missing from the documentation are any maps showing where the water and sewer will be going. I have asked the city if any maps are available. There are several properties abutting airport land owned by popular contributors to city council campaigns.

Also on tonight's agenda, extension of water and sewer along Pleasant Ridge Road for which individual homeowners owners, unrepresented by moneyed interests, are being assessed between $2,700 and $7,000 each.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Uh, make that $3,364,000

In the comments to this post in which I ask some questions about the $1,546,000 grant the taxpayers of Greensboro may be about to make to the Airport Authority, an anonymous commenter notes that also on the agenda is a resolution authorizing the use of $1,800,000 from the Greensboro Water and Sewer Trust fund to extend water and sewer to industrial sites on the airport property.

The suspect cost aside, that is the way one might expect to see funds allocated for water and sewer extensions. Thus we are back to square one on our knowledge of the $1,546,000 grant to the Airport Authority, i.e. still ignorant of what it is for.

I appreciate the comments I am getting here and offline attempting to help bring some understanding to this. I know that Amanda Lehmert of the News & Record is attempting to get documentation to answer some of the questions raised. In the mean time, can this serve as a convenient example of how good our city government is at communications and transparency -- NOT! Seriously folks, here it is 24 hours before city council is about to consider spending over $3 million on some airport stuff and the public hasn't a clue--really, really piss poor public relations.

More on Greensboro's mysterious $1,564,000 payment to the airport

An anonymous commenter to my previous post says this about the $1,564,000 that the Greensboro City Council is to consider giving to the Piedmont Triad Airport Authority tomorrow night:
"It represents funds designated years ago for the City to help pay for sewer passing beneath Bryan Blvd. Some sewer originates off of the airport property but passes through the airport on the way to the plant. The alternative would be a pump station, which may have a lower initial cost, but would have to be maintained forever.

"Nothing sinister there, just normal, everyday, well executed growth of the city's w&S system" 

Assuming the anonymous commenter is not completely off base:

1. What is the history and where is the record of this responsibility being "designated" to the City of Greensboro? When, where and by whom was this "years ago" financial obligation assumed by or assigned to Greensboro?

2. Where is the property to which this sewer is being extended? Who owns it?

3. By what authority does the Airport Authority involve itself in extending utilities to facilities off its property? I am pretty sure that is not within the scope of its charter.

4. Why is this being paid to the Airport Authority? If Greensboro is to build a sewer line, by what rationale do we have to pay the Airport Authority for it?

Anonymous assures there is nothing sinister here. If that's true, the answers to these questions should be forthcoming and found acceptable before council even begins to consider approving this.

Greensboro to give $1,564,000 to airport?

Does anybody know the details of item #13 on the agenda for tomorrow's Greensboro City Council meeting?
"Resolution authorizing the use and appropriation of $1,564,000 of voter approved Economic Development Bond Funds on an Economic Development Incentive Grant to Piedmont Triad Airport Authority. (roll call vote) (Attachment #13 to Council members) "
The referred to attachment is not online and a Google search for details comes up empty.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Naw, Greensboro doesn't have a police shortage

Aggregated local videos on Greensboro101 continue to illuminate. Two street fights in downtown Greensboro within two minutes of each other.

Video: Protester's encounter with GPD

One of the things I've long liked about local blogs is getting from them a better understanding of individuals' perspectives on life in Greensboro. Now that Greensboro101 is aggregating local video, I am finding that window opening even wider.

I always admire people who know and stand up for their rights as the guy behind the camera does at this anti-abortion gathering.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Candidate has secret plan

One of the downsides of being a hardass for the facts is that you sometimes end up having to scold people you find quite likable. I've done it before with the always friendly Cyndy Hayworth and today I am going to do it again.

Previously, my complaint of Cyndy was about a letter to the N&R in which Cyndy got her facts wrong. She has another letter today, this one in support of at-large candidate Danny Thompson in which she writes of Thompson:
"He has a plan for Greensboro that will lay the groundwork to bring jobs and growth and at the same time eliminate some of the excess in the budget."
A plan? Really? A desire, maybe, but a plan? I'd sure like to read it. I don't see it on his website. So what is Thompson's plan and can the rest of us be let in on it? And if the man doesn't have a plan, don't say he has one, okay, Cyndy? Because that is like, you know, fibbing.

Getting to know you...

Tony Wilkins writes about Greensboro City Council district 4 candidate Joel Landau removing the name of a supporter from his web site and draws his conclusions. Candidate Landau replies. This is the way it should work: Give and take, questions answered, misconceptions cleared up. Good work Tony and Joel.

[Title changed: The original title of this post was "Getting to know you... (or, speculatively, Burckley smear attempt stymied)." I have updated this post to remove the speculative alternative. In a post about a matter that involved, to a significant degree, getting the facts right, there is no place for that kind of speculation. I know that Bill Burckely has been hired by Landau's opponent and I know he takes a gloves-off approach to campaigning, but I have no evidence whatsoever that he was involved in this and since I try to promote a fact-based approach to issues, capitualting to personal suspicions is hypocritical. I shouldn't have done it and I am sorry I did.]

Thursday, October 15, 2009

When I'm 64

I hope I remain this cogent when I am "older." District 2 City Council candidate Nettie Coad makes the case of why her age is a benefit, not a disadvantage as some appear to think. Missing from Coad's defense is the most obvious to me, that she is activley engaging in the vivacious new media, blogging and posting YouTube videos, while her younger opponent Jim Kee is the fuddy duddy, apparently unable to even handle his own email.

New garbage cans flawed

Our old garbage can went kaput several weeks ago. The city replaced it with one of the new variety. The new cans are flawed: The lids flop open when the truck puts them back down -- making for a nasty soup in the bottom on rainy days like today.


As you can see from this picture, the lid closes on the old style cans but on the same terrain, the lid on the new can stays open when it is returned to the curb. In addition to making the cans messier during rainy weather, I have to wonder if these new cans won't become breeding pools for mosquitoes in the summer. If there is a reason why these new cans are better, I'm not seeing it. They are inferior as far as I can tell.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Fact checking candidates

This is the kind of thing I think of as good journalism, doing the follow up non-reporters don't have the time to do for the purpose of holding those who would represent us accountable: The (Greensboro, NC) News & Record Gerald Witt fact checks district four city council candidates. I hope we'll see more of this.

Faking it

Ryan Shell finds Moses Cone faking it. On its web site, it looks like Moses Cone is participating in social media but, click on the Facebook, YouTube, Twitter or Linkedin icons and, eh, not so much. Still, those icons must look neato to the kids, right?

Monday, October 12, 2009

Fractured Fairytales Haunted House 2009

If the haunted house is as scary as the video...



Mary Foust Residence Hall at UNCG is having its annual Haunted House. The theme is Fractured Fairytales. It will take place on October 17th from 8pm to Midnight. Admission is $5 and $3 with a canned good. All proceeds will go to Newcomer School (of Greensboro) and the canned goods will go to Greensboro Urban Ministry.

Fur real

The aggregated video on Greensboro101.com continue to yield interesting glimpses into Greensboro.

For example, did you know Greensboro recently hosted a bowling night for the Carolina furs? The video is quite boring, but I did not previously know there was a community in the area dedicated to furries. Not for me, thanks, but hey, to each his own.

Friday, October 09, 2009

Science Center Vid

Digging the new video aggregator on Greensboro101.com. This popped up this afternoon:

Proposed hotel has my spidey sense tingling

I am not hearing alarm bells, seeing red flags or smelling something fishy... but my spidey sense is tingling.

According to the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record, there is a "group" that wants the city of Greensboro to give them four acres out of the ten slated for redevelopment at the South Elm/Lee Street area so that they can build a hotel with federal stimulus funds and have the revenue go "into the hands of Ole Asheboro residents..."

This is where the time and reources of the mainstream media (i.e. The News & Record) need to be put to their highest use, as a watchdog on behalf of the public. Questions that need to be answered:
  • Who are the principles who will manage the proposed hotel and what is their track record? Have they done this before and how have their previous projects fared?
  • What does it mean that the revenue from the proposed hotel will go "into the hands of Ole Asheboro residents?" How?
  • What will be the criteria for revenue participation and who will be the decision maker? Will the residents' participation in the revenue be through employment or through some other means of profit-sharing? Will people be "in" solely based on the location of their abode? If so, what are the geographical boundaries?
  • Is it appropriate for the City to make a donation to a for-profit project where a stated objective is to selectively include and exclude participants by some currently vague and potentially unfair criteria?
  • Are this group's expectations fiscally realistic? Reports thus far mention as the only source of funding government grants. Can and will a project of this size be entirely funded by government funds? If not, from where will additional funding come? Who will underwrite cost overruns or additional liabilities?
  • Who will fund the considerable start-up and operational costs beyond what grants may fund construction? Is there a business plan?
  • How and to what degree are the people who are advancing this proposal vested in its financial outcome?
  • Is this the highest and best use of this public land and federal stimulus funds? What other options would be sacrificed for the sake of this project?

Thursday, October 08, 2009

Unmitigated gall

Ed Cone brings this snippet from a Rhinoceros Times article to our attention.
Commissioner Mike Winstead [...] said he was less excited about Arnold's revised plan than he was when the original plan was first presented. The original plan Arnold wanted included tax breaks for those who added to the tax base by building houses, apartment complexes and even additions to homes, and that no doubt had some appeal to Winstead, who is developer. However, the final version of Arnold's plan did not include those tax breaks.
"It's not going to do all that I was hoping it would do," Winstead said.
Roger Greene responds at Ed's with a comment that reflects my sentiments:
"I don't know how to embellish the 'fox guarding the henhouse' analogy any better than the fact that Winstead was enamored with a proposal that boosts his own business interest without a hint of irony, in that he never mentions the words 'recusal' or 'conflict of interest', etc."

Bill O’Reilly Fact Checks Jon Stewart

Sam Spagnola:
"CNN fact checked last weeks Saturday Night Live Barack Obama opening skit for accuracy, marking the first time a news network fact checked a comedy sketch."
Yes, the first time -- this month.

Last month, however:

What if it's not made of cheese?

Could the recent rapid rise in gold suddenly deflate? What if a new source is discovered?

Air Uterus City, we are

My Greek is a little rusty, so someone correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't aerotropolis mean "air uterus city?" If we want to coin "air city" from Greek, isn't it correctly "aeropolis?"

(Although, if the spinmeisters intend to convey that we are a place of motherhood and airport jobs, maybe aerotropolis is intentional.)

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Councilor Mike Barber hitting the road

Judging from the number of names in the recipient list of his email announcement, this will probably be widely known in, oh, about five minutes, but Greensboro attorney and City Council representative Mike Barber announced today that he is closing his law practice in December and taking an eighteen month sabbatical to explore opportunities and travel with his family. He did not run for reelection this year and his term expires in December.

Good for him. My first from-afar and mistaken impression of Mike was that he was as kind of a cheese loaf of a politician when he was a county commissioner. I have since come to admire him as a business man and employer; and, most admirable to me, as a superb public servant. During his tenure on City Council, Mike was an independent thinker with the emphasis on thinking. His allegiance was first and foremost to the facts and his ability to evaluate them with reason. He was not out to make friends or to advance the interest of a particular group or district. He was motivated, it appeared to me, simply to exercise his best judgment. That's a rarity and very much appreciated.

Have fun, Mike.

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

Election analysis

Some thoughts on the Greensboro city council primary election results.

1. Low minority turnout
Turnout in the predominantly black districts one and  two was very low. In district one, the 1,376 voters were nearly 25% fewer than the number who voted in the 2007 primary; and in district two there were only 1,115 voters (there was no D2 primary in 2007). Districts one, two, three and four all had competitive primaries, but in predominately white districts three and four there were 3,457 and 3,318 voters respectively. Which leads to...

2. A new mayor?
Mayor Johnson will have a real challenge to her reelection. In 2007, the year she was elected as mayor, Johnson won by getting a majority in district four. Without it, she would have lost to barely-visible Miltion Kern.

Three factors could give Johnson trouble in November: If interest remains low in districts one and two; If Mary Rakestraw's supporters, more likely aligned with fellow Republican and mayoral challenger Bill Knight, turn out big and diminish or eliminate Johnson's 2007 district four majority; and if new voters from Knight's home turf of The Cardinal*, voting in a Greensboro municipal election for the fist time this year, turn out in significant numbers.

3. Squeaky close at-large race
We've got a good old fashion horse race in the at-large race. The second and sixth place at-large finishers were separated by a mere 493 votes out of 29,153, or only 1.7% of the total votes cast. (Compare to a nearly 1,700 vote spread in 2007, when even fewer votes were cast).

4. Mayor Pro-tem Vaughan?
I suspect Nancy Vaughan is too smart to take anything for granted, but finishing first by getting a vote from one out of every two voters is a good indication of strong popularity. Of course, Mary Rakestraw did nearly the same thing in 2007 and ended up coming in third in the general election. We'll see.

5. Win some, lose some
For what it's worth, I cast three votes in the at-large race and one of my choices did not finish in the top six. I'll send that person a private thank you, but really, all the candidates who did not make it through the primary deserve a heartfelt thank you for their time and effort and for giving us a real variety of options.

* UPDATE: Alert reader "N" notes that, while Bill Knight is president of the Cardinal Golf & Country Club, he actually lives in Sunset Hills in district four.

Primary results

With 6% of registered voters having voted, the results of the Greensboro city council primary are in. My predicted order of finish for each candidate is in parenthesis next to the at-large candidates.

At-Large
========
1. (1) Nancy Vaughan -- 5,020
2. (4) Robbie Perkins -- 3,829
3. (5) Sandra Anderson-Groat -- 3,781
4. (3) Danny Thompson -- 3,752
5. (8) Gary Nixon -- 3,432
6. (2) MariKay AbuZuaiter -- 3,336
7. (9) Ryan Shell -- 1,693
8. (7) DJ Hardy -- 1,667
9. (6) Julie Lapham -- 1,519
10. (10) Jorge Cornell -- 689
11. (11) Max Benbassat -- 435

District 1
=======
1. T. Dianne Bellamy-Small -- 597
2. Luther T. Falls, Jr. -- 232

Blogger Ben Holder finished out of the money with 146 votes.

District 2
========
1. Jim Kee -- 576
2. Nettie Coad -- 332

District 3
========
1. Zack Matheny -- 1,893
2. George Hartzman -- 1,127

District 4
=======
1. Mary Rakestraw -- 1,631
2. Joel Landau -- 1,172


There was no primary in district 5 where incumbent Trudy Wade will face Art Boyett and no primary for mayor where incument Yvonne Johnson will face Bill Knight. Complete election resutls are here. The general election is on November 3rd.

Election results and last minute voter info

Results for the Greensboro municipal primary will be online here.

Polls close at 7:30. If you need last minute candidate information, check out the News & Record's election web site. If you are not sure what district you are in, see this. If you are not sure where to vote or have any other voting related questions, call the Guilford County Board of Elections at 641-3836.

Monday, October 05, 2009

City Council at-large predictions

These are simply my expectations for the outcome of tomorrow's Greensboro City Council at-large primary race. They are not endorsements. If you like what you see, you will have to vote to bring it to fruition. If my predictions disappoint you, then vote and make me wrong.

The predictions are based on funds raised and spent, endorsements, candidate exposure (positive and negative), buzz and what I think I know about who will constitute the Greensboro electorate tomorrow.

1. Nancy Vaughan
2. MariKay AbuZuatier
3. Danny Thompson
4. Robbie Perkins
5. Sandra Anderson-Groat
6. Julie Lapham*
7. DJ Hardy*
8. Gary Nixon*
9. Ryan Shell
10. Jorge Cornell
11. Max Benbassat

* I found it really difficult to put 6, 7 and 8 in order. I think it will be really tight here, with the real possibility that any of these three could make it through the primary.

Sunday, October 04, 2009

District 3 council candidate Hartzman reneges on campaign financing promise

[Disclosure: District 3 candidate Zack Matheny is a paid advertiser on web sites operated by this blogger]

Greensboro city council district 3 candidate George Hartzman on campaign contributions:
"Hartzman has said that he will not take money from political action committees or accept campaign contributions of more than $100." -- Yes!Weekly, 8/12/2009

"I’m not taking more than $100 from anyone." -- George Hartzman, News & Record, 9/8/2009
According to George Hartzman's campaign finance report filed with the Guilford County Board of Elections, he has accepted individual contributions of $1,000 and $500, the $1,000 contribution coming more than a week before the News & Record reported him saying that he was "not taking more than $100 from anyone."

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Looking for some thoughtless and immature voting advice? My cronies and I recommend Yes! Weekly.

Yes! Weekly published its anonymous endorsements for city council this week. In addition to endorsing more candidates than voters can vote for in each race, they (he? she?) explained the endorsements with some rather questionable reasoning, including saying they (he? she?) support at-large candidate Robbie Perkins "for his staunch support of former City Manager Mitchell Johnson."

That prompted me to ask in the comments:
"Can you explain why being a staunch supporter of Mitch Johnson is a plus in your book?"
To which an anonymous commenter on behalf of Yes! replied:
"Roch: We do not agree with you and your cronies about Mitch Johnson and you damn well know it. We have a long body of work, thousands of words, stating our reasons. Feel free to hit our archives."
If you are looking for thoughtless immaturity as a guide for your voting decisions, Yes! is for you.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

"It's brutal, it's cruel, it's senseless. It's so unnecessary."

"We have no money, we have no medicine and now they want to take away the panhandlers licenses."

The invisible man is mute too

Ed Cone called Greensboro city council candidate at-large Gary Nixon the invisible man for his lack of internet presence.

My dad suggested that I email Mr. Nixon and just ask him why he doesn't have a website or a blog. So I did, to the email address listed in the N&R candidate profile. My first email of Sunday afternoon got no reply, so I sent a second on Monday night. Still no reply.

Ed worried that, not only is there a lack of information about Mr. Nixon, but that his avoidance of modern communication tools might indicate "luddism, or at least fuddy-duddism." Whatever you call it, ignoring email is an indication to me that this candidate would not be good at responding to constituents if elected.

Martin Street: Den of iniquity or home of Greensboro's next big thing?

Ryan Shell wrote this on his blog today:
"I had a conversation with someone last night about Martin St, which is located off of Lee St and just a few blocks from downtown. It’s a small street, but one that is widely known for gang activity, drug sales, and public consumption of alcohol – not exactly a lot of positives."
Martin Street rang a bell for me. It is the address of the headquarters for Urban Hotel Group, the newly formed company that proposes to build a $75 million hotel on Lee Street.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

A tale of two stories

Two media outlets, same crime, two descriptions of the suspects:

From the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record:
"...three suspects, including one armed with a handgun..."
From WGHP:
"...three black males wearing dark colored hoodies."

Monday, September 28, 2009

"Danny Thompson Common Sense"

Occasionally, I post candidate videos as a public service. It does not constitute an endorsement..

Caamano for City Council

Reminded that this year's primary ballot for Greensboro City Council will list candidates alphabetically starting with "C," the candidate formerly known as Ryan Shell officially changed his name today to Ryan Caamano.

Your other left

This sign on Pisgah Church Road today warned of lane closure ahead.



Here is the lane closure:

Litterbug for city council

Is throwing your campaign literature into the yards of voters a smart way to engender support?


I appreciate his effort, but I have to give district 3 candidate George Hartzman the award for "most annoying candidate."

And did fellow district 3 candidate Jay Ovittore go on vacation?

McDonald's suckage

The McDonald's Big 'N Tasy with Cheese as advertised:



The Big 'N Tasty with Chese as served at Battleground/Cone McDondalds in Greensboro, NC:

Handicapping the at-large race

My updated expected order of finish for the Greensboro city council at-large race. Determined by an informal assessment of positive name-recognition, money raised, yard-sign distribution, buzz, my understanding of the Greensboro electorate and expected voter turnout. Numbers in green (up) and red (down) indicate the candidate's change in position, if any, since the last prediction.

1. MariKay AbuZuaiter +1
2. Nancy Vaughan -1
3. Robbie Perkins
4. Danny Thompson +4
5. Sandra Anderson-Groat +2
6. DJ Hardy -1
7. Julie Lapham -1
8. Gary Nixon +2
9. Ryan Shell -4
10. Jorge Cornell -1
11. Max Benbassat

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Deleted from News & Record story: "The threats would be coming more from them than the criminals."

Before the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record scrubbed their story on the reinstatement of AJ Blake to the Greensboro Police Department, Jerry Bledsoe printed the original. Here is what he says was subsequently deleted from the story without comment or explanation.
"It's obvious I can't work with (the gang squad)," Blake said. "The threats would be coming more from them than the criminals." 
Why would the N&R remove this without comment or explanation? 

Piedmont Publius: News & Record launders another story

SamH at Piedmont Publius about the News & Record's story "Police officer gets his job back after appeal.":
"I could swear I saw a quote from Blake in yesterday’s N&R online version saying he wouldn’t be rejoining the gang unit because he probably would face more harassment from fellow officers than the gangs themselves. An interesting perspective from a police officer who’s lucky to have a job, I thought to myself.

"But the N&R —city government’s media partner —– appears to have deleted that quote from both today’s print edition and updated online versions. Evidently they have some sort of interest in helping Blake ease back into his duties as a public servant."
Did the News & Record remove that commentary by Blake from its online story without comment? (It would not be the first time, or the second, or the third, or the fourth, or the fifth, or the sixth.)

[UPDATE: Jerry Bledsoe provides the deleted quoation.]

Friday, September 25, 2009

Endorsement of Hartzman

A letter in today's News & Record:
--------------

I have known George Hartzman for six years and believe him to be careful in spending taxpayers’ money.

He is young and has the ability and strength to add to his family and investment lives that of being a political leader on the City Council in District 3..

Also, I have read one of his books, “Thinking,” which is challenging.

John Hancock
Greensboro

 ------

No doubt.

The book, BTW, is titled "Think." From the book's description:
"Think is an evolving philosophy questioning what did, is, could, should and shouldn't. The who to find, is you and what to do now."

WSJS newsman does not understand divorce rate

For the second day now, I've caught WSJS's newsman Smith Patterson reporting on Rockingham County's high divorce rate. A rate of over 15%, highest in North Carolina -- he says.

Wrong.

Patterson is reporting that 15% of the people living in Rockingham County are divorced and calling it the divorce rate. That is not the divorce rate.That is a measure of marital status--not the same thing. The divorce rate measures the rate at which marriages end in divorce not the percentage of people in any given population who are divorced.

Think of it this way. If you wanted to know a county's school system's graduation rate, would you measure the number of high school seniors who graduate from among the high school seniors in that system or would you measure the percentage of the entire county population who have a diploma? One thing would measure the schools' graduation rate, the other would measure the populace's educational attainment, two different things. Smith Patterson is erroneously reporting the populace's marital status as the county's divorce rate.

There are two big mistakes in saying that the divorced percentage of the population reflects the divorce rate.
  1. A divorce rate must measure against marriages, not against the population at large (Children and other people never married cannot meaningfully be included in the population from among which the rate of divorce is measured). A county that has 1,000 marriages with 400 of them ending in divorce has a higher divorce rate than the county that has 10,000 marriages ending in 400 divorces -- same number of divorces, different divorce rates.
  2. It fails to account for people moving in our out of the county. If I get divorced in Florida then move to Rockingham County, I contribute to the percentage of divorced people in Rockingham County, but I do not contribute to the percentage of marriages ending in divorce (the divorce rate) in Rockingham County because my marriage did not end in divorce in Rockingham County.
The Winston-Salem journal gets it right, reporting accuratley on the percentage of people living in Rockingham County who are divorced. WSJS's Smith Patterson, in reporting that this is the divorce rate, is just wrong.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Speakers from the floor. It could be worse.

Hat tip Lex.


"It is time for those who supported Mitch Johnson's witch hunt to give up and admit they were wrong."

Talk to enough people about the "black book" and you'll hear the kind of whispers I have. In fact, as John Hammer points out in this week's Rhinceros Times, the accusations against cops Wray, Brady and Sanders have, all along, been nothing more than unsubstantiated whispers.

They still persist in updated versions: "Oh, it's not THAT black book, it's the others that remain secret," or "Wait til the secret tapes come out." Yeah? Those sounds awfully similar to the "If you only knew what we know" that Hammer rightly recalls was the empty message that justified this colossal failure in public policy. In the end, the people saying "If you only knew what we know" did not know shit. And the people who tell me that there is another shoe, or two, to drop do not know shit either, except that they have a problem with reality. Hammer puts their BS straight up against the undeniable facts:
"It has been investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Bureau of Investigation, the United States Department of Justice and the Greensboro Police Department, and the allegations made against Wray and his staff are unfounded. Certainly if what Mitch Johnson said were true, one of these investigations would have turned up sufficient evidence of wrongdoing to take action, but they have not"
Read the whole thing.

Handicapping the at-large race -- UPDATED

It occurred to me that in my previous handicapping of the at-large Greensboro city council race, I ignored an obvious tool at my disposal--one that ads to the knowledge of "buzz." By using the search function of the main page of Greensboro101, I can see the number of times a candidate's name appears in a blog or news story in the past week. Armed with that additional data, here are my current predictions for the order of finish for the October 6th primary.

1. Nancy Vaughan
2. MariKay AbuZuaiter
3. Robbie Perkins
4. DJ Hardy +1
5. Ryan Shell +1
6. Julie Lapham -2
-------
7. Sandra Anderson-Groat
8. Danny Thompson
9. Jorge Cornell +1
10 Gary Nixon -1
11. Max Benbasst

Handicapping the at-large race

Judging by media coverage, finance reports, buzz and my perception of the Greensboro electorate, here is this week's predicted order of finish for the October 6th, Greensboro city council at-large primary, from which six will advance. (They do not reflect my order of preference, I remaining largely undecided, for what that's worth.)

1. Nancy Vaughan
2. MariKay AbuZuaiter
3. Robbie Perkins
4. Julie Lapham
5. DJ Hardy
6. Ryan Shell
-------
7. Sandra Anderson-Groat
8. Danny Thompson
9. Gary Nixon
10 Jorge Cornell
11. Max Benbassat

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Grace.

Inbox: Greensboro homeless to have council candidates forum

In my inbox:
-------------------

The Interactive Resource Center would like to invite you to visit the participate in a candidates lunch and discussion with members of Greensboro's homeless community.  Please RSVP to communicationforchange@gmail.com or 430-3125.

WHAT:  Meet the Candidates lunch discussion for Greensboro City Council candidates
WHERE: Interactive Resource Center, 3015 E. Bessemer Avenue
WHEN: Thursday, October 1, 12:00 to 1:00

Hope to see you there!

Liz Seymour, Director

Helping the News & Record do laundry

Yesterday, I wrote about the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record's difficulty aligning their heretofore fact-deprived narrative of the "black book" with common knowledge, resulting in this:

"The lawsuit accuses the city, former Police Chief David Wray, former Deputy Police Chief Randall Brady and Detective Scott Sanders of a pattern of harassment and discrimination that included an alleged photo lineup or “black book” of black officers used in criminal investigations."

 Today, without comment or explanation, the article looks like this:

"The lawsuit accuses the city, former police Chief David Wray, former Deputy Police Chief Randall Brady and Detective Scott Sanders of a pattern of harassment and discrimination that included a photo lineup or “black book” of black officers used in a criminal investigation."
I guess I should be grateful for small favors (I am); that somebody was big enough to bring that article inline with the facts (they were). I remain puzzled though by the N&R's willingness to launder articles without comment. It seems to me as if the paper of record should maintain some sort of, I dunno, record.

Monday, September 21, 2009

Can someone translate this News & Record article to English for me?

From an article today by Ryan Seals in the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record reporting that the Department of Justice has declined to prosecute the City of Greensboro for discrimination on behalf of black police officers, Seals writes:
"The lawsuit accuses the city, former Police Chief David Wray, former Deputy Police Chief Randall Brady and Detective Scott Sanders of a pattern of harassment and discrimination that included an alleged photo lineup or “black book” of black officers used in criminal investigations."
That is a meaningless jumble.  Try to answer this question: What is that paragraph describing as alleged?

This is the News & Record reaping the consequences of refusing to come to terms with the facts surrounding the "black book." The News & Record has now gone so far down the rabbit hole in avoiding admitting its previous reporting errors, that only gobbledygook can link its previous reporting with the common knowledge of its readers as informed by other sources.

[Update: The article has been edited.]

Greensboro Partnership city council candidate questionnaires

The Greensboro Partnership sent an economic development survey to city council candidates. As the title implies, it asks questions related to economic development or, at least, economic development the way it has come to be seen in Greensboro, including questions about support of the Greenway, incentives, creation of a water authority and the "critical importance" of completing the Urban Loop.

Because of its premise, my favorite question was this one:
#9. Public funding needs exceed the city's available resources. Which of the following options would you support as a way to finance public budge items?
The question about how the city can continue to support Action Greensboro was a good one too.

The completed surveys are available here. Click on a district (at-large, district 1, etc) and the individual survey results are available beneath each candidate.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Local media failures a pox on Greensboro

If you have given up on reading Jerry Bledsoe's "Cops in Black and White" in the Rhinoceros Times because you think you "get it;" or, if as someone rather surprisingly told me yesterday, you have formed an opinion that it is not worth your attention without having read any of it; or if you are a local journalist who worries that you might ruin your weekend with the discomfort of facing the failures of your enterprise and colleagues, do yourself a favor and read anyway this week's chapter 85.

It is about the incredible lie perpetrated on the people of Greensboro and how the lie gained a foothold that had people and institutions become invested in perpetuating the lie, even when their professional responsibilities were to refute it.

The storytelling by our local media regarding the "black book" is the most monumental failure of Greensboro's institutions in my lifetime. Their refusal to acknowledge or correct their mistakes is the most heartbreaking disappointment this Greensboro son has seen in anything "Greensboro" since moving here in 1970.

The News & Record gave its imprimatur to fabrications, then declined to dispel the myths when new information was revealed. This failure sits on the shoulders of editor John Robinson and publisher Robin Saul. Yeah, it's rude to call people out, and I don't like how it makes me feel personally. But these decisions were not made by a building or a masthead or a company, they were made by real people who bear their responsibility.

The News & Record opinion pages called for a full and complete revelation of the truth surrounding the black book. When that truth conflicted with tales already spun, The News & Record pulled up short, its windy protestations suddenly no longer serious. The News & Record rejected substantive critiques of how it covered this issue from its opinion pages by explaining that such examinations had already been thoroughly undertaken in local blogs. These decisions were not made by a newspaper, or an editorial page, or a corporation, these decisions were made by a real person; this failure sits on the shoulders of opinion editor Allen Johnson.

Local television follows the lead of local newspapers. As long as the News & Record is complicit in letting the myth stand, WFMY gets a free pass on their continued perpetuation of the black book myth, but they should know better.

There are two serious consequences to these failures. First, Greensboro can now look forward to another generation of unnecessary racial suspicion, between the "yes it was" implications of believing the black book myths and the "no it wasn't" understanding of the truth. Let's spend another thirty years with our fingers crossed that we'll just "move on" and forget. Without a mass forgetting, subsequent legitimate charges of racism will have a harder time being taken seriously, first having to prove they are not a product of the local media "crying wolf" again.

Second, Greensboro is consigned to going forward knowing we are operating at the disadvantage of having small media that will choose concealing their own ineptitudes at the expense of pursuing the truth; that any genuine understanding of who we are as a community is in jeopardy; that any perception we think we have of ourselves, if gleaned from the media, may simply be a chimera.

We face a future almost certain to include stepping on some otherwise avoidable landmine because the institutions reponsible for shining the light on our path will extinguish the light if they find themselves poorly reflected in it. They would prefer to let us stumble through the dark rather than utter the simple but too-big-for-Greensboro words of "We made a mistake."

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Talking to dad about the elections

I'd like to think it is because he repects my opinion, but even if it's just to give us something to talk about, that's okay too. Either way, my dad always asks for my thoughts about municipal elections. He asked about the upcoming primaries today. I'll keep the conversation private, but one thing that occured to me is that we have the best slate of candidates I've seen in over a decade.

That's not to disparage anybody who has run in the past, but this year we have an exciting breadth of attributes and qualifications among the candidates that we simply have not had in a while -- if ever. It is going to be damn difficult to narrow down the at-large candidates to only three. We are fortunate to have that kind of dilema. If you want to see what I am talking about, check out the News & Record's Amanda Lehmert's most excellent collection of elction and candidate information.

Thumbs down: Lowe's Home Improvement supplier Web-Don Countertops

I ordered a 3' x 6' laminated counter top from Lowe's in mid August. I was told it would arrive on August 31. On September 2nd, having not heard anything, I called Lowes and was told it had been backordered and would be delivered to the store on September 16. Today I got a call. It has been back ordered again and may arrive next week.

The Lowe's vendor making this coutnertop is Web-Don out of Winston-Salem.

Be advised: Thumbs down.

Baucus's Trojan horse. Will Hagan bite?

Senator Max Baucus released a health care bill from the Senate Finance Committee yesterday for which North Carolina's Democratic senator Kay Hagan offered her partial support.

The Baucus bill is a gift to insurance companies disguised as health care reform. Let us hope Hagan recognizes this.

Matt Taibbi explains the principles reflected in the Baucus bill:

Those principles seem to have been: no single-payer system, no meaningful public option, no meaningful employer mandates and a very meaningful mandate for individual consumers. In other words, the only major reform with teeth would be the one forcing everyone to buy some form of private insurance, no matter how crappy, or suffer a tax penalty. If the public option is the sine qua non for progressives, then the "individual mandate" is the counterpart must-have requirement for the insurance industry.

Children at play. News & Record editor's juvenile antics

The (Greensboro, NC) News & Record added a note to a letter to the editor today saying "The News & Record opposes the state Education Lottery."

The News & Record's web site lists several people as on the editorial staff who are, in fact, no longer with the N&R including Becky Layton, Elma Sabo and Dennis Shelton. Clearly the editorial staff listing online is not up to date. So I emailed the editorial page editor Allen Johnson. Here is the exchange, each message copied in its entirety*.
Hi Allen,

Can you tell me who are the individuals that formed that opinion on behalf of the News & Record?

Yours,
Roch 
Allen replied:
Yes, they are listed every day on the top of the editorial page.
I responded.:
I did not ask you where they are listed. Will you tell me, please, who they are.
He wrote back:
They are on the page. I don't have time to do your reporting for you, Roch.
Seriously? What's next? "I know you are but what am I?" "Your mama?"

Geez.

[* My first message had the subject line "The News & Record opposes the state Education Lottery."]

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Bloggin' Bencini

A new blog appeared on Greensboro101 today that I hadn't seen before. It is written by Rob Bencini. Bencini, former economic developer for Guilford County, promises a "different eye-opening way of looking at business, the economy and economic development."

This should be good.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Congratulations Lex

Former (Greensboro, NC) News & Record reporter and citizen journalism sacrificial lamb Lex Alexandar has a new job. He was kind of coy about it, only hinting at it at his blog, mumbling something about not mixing blogging and work. Yes! Weekly announces it plainly however, so congratulations Lex on your new job as Director of External Communications at Greensboro College. Lex is one smart dude, he should be a great asset to GC.

You know what grinds my gears? Unsigned newspaper editorials.

Can someone explain this to me? Why does the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record still insist on publishing unsigned editorials? There are two editors at the N&R, Allen Johnson and Doug Clark. Any editorial is going to be written by one or the other and it is pretty easy to tell whose ideas you are reading. What is the advantage of publishing an unsigned "staff" editorial? Seriously. Other than trying to fool people with some kind of man-behind-the-curtain pretense of weightiness, is there a good reason I am failing to see? Seriously, I must be missing something.

More local hypocricy on health care

Local blogger Brenda is against "government run health care." She doesn't even like the bipartisan Baucus proposal on health care. She is afraid "Our great grand children are going to be paying our doctors bill for us."

Brenda is on Medicare.

More and more I am seeing people opposed to health care reform are either stupendously selfish--"I've got mine, you can go jump in a lake" kind of people--or they are confused.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Will somebody tell T Dianne Bellamy Small to contact me? I have her email address

According to the News & Record, city council person T. Dianne Bellamy Small's campaign email address is tdbsforcouncil@gmail.com. I tried to send to it. It was not a valid account. It is now, belonging to yours truly.

It's the twenty-first-friggin' century people. Let's try to keep up. If I weren't such a nice guy, I could sit here for the rest of the election season and impersonate a city council representative with this whizzbang new technology. As it is, I'll help her get that address back if she wants it.

[UPDATE: I have been informed that the email listed at the N&R was a typo, I am told the correct address is tdbsforcouncil@mail.com and the N&R web site now lists that as the email address.]

I love me some irony

The (Greensboro, NC) News & Record would not allow online comments on freelance columnist Charles Davenport, Jr's most recent column. N&R editor Allen Johnson provided various reasons for why not, each at odd wtih the facts, then finally wrote a post attempting to explain why again and people use his post as a forum to have the discussion not allowed beneath Davenport's column.

Greensboro101.com: The crowd knows

Another thing I like about the new Greensboro101.com is that it is really easy to see what local items people think are worth recommending.

Item previews include a "Recommend this item" button.



Items that have received at least one recommendation are shown in the "Hot" tabs on the main, news and blog pages. The wisdom of the crowd brings the notable items to our attention.

Greensboro101.com: Local, smarter

One of the things I like about the new Greensboro101.com is that it gathers all of the latest items from Greensboro sources on one page. At a glance, you can see the latest items from a variety of sources on one screen.



If you want to see the latest from only newsorgs or only from blogs, that's easy. Just use the navigator in the upper left corner to select the blog or news home page.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Big Brother watching -- update on greenway bench camera

According to Greensboro College, the camera trained on the Greenway benches was installed on the "Greenway right of way." The online plat and data viewer do not show any such right of way or easement. I have asked Lex Alexandar in his capacity as the new Greensboro College director for external communications to point me to documentation that delineates this right of way. [Update: Greensboro College granted an easement to the City of Greensboro in June of 2008. Documented here.]

According to Jeri Rowe, the camera is owned by the City of Greensboro and was moved from another location to meet this need. Jeri says Action Greensboro has purchased another camera to replace the one that was moved at a cost of $6,000. It is unclear if Action Greensboro will own that camera and lend it to the city, give it to the city or sell it to the city.

Pictures taken by the camera are available online for a limited time each day.* They are deleted automatically at midnight. Today's were posted at 8:52 AM. It is unclear when the pictures were taken as there is no date or time stamp.

Of the sixteen pictures available online today, only one shows a human subject.



The rest look like this:


[* Update: Apparently, the pictures were made available online only by request, only for fifteen hours before being removed and subsequent pictures are not posted to the City's web site as a regular matter of course.]

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Much better blogs

One of the features I really like about the new Greensboro 101 is the ability to read the latest local blog posts sorted by blogger (or author).

From the Greensboro 101 home page, use the navigator in the upper left corner to go to the Blogs page.

 
On the Blogs page, you may then select the "Blogs" tab, which will display the list of local bloggers.



Click on the name of a blogger in the list and the titles of their latest posts will be displayed. Click on a particular post and it will appear in the viewport window.
.

Jeri Rowe, man's man.

The News & Record's Jeri Rowe called me yesterday to discuss my post about his report on the surveillance of benches on the Greenway.

What a refreshing conversation. My post was highly critical of Jeri's reporting, but Jeri did not call to argue or to roll over for the sake of avoiding confrontation. Instead we had a man-to-man conversation about the issues at hand -- honest, forthright and productive. Jeri explained to me where my knowledge was lacking and acknowledged my legitimate concerns. We joked about whether the proper spelling is "gawd-awful" or "gawdawful" and I feigned shock at his salty language. But in the end, we had a better understanding of each other, the issues and, most importantly, how to proceed in pursuit of a positive outcome. Jeri said he would follow up with an attempt to clarify some of the questions I raised (some of which have subsequently been answered).

Jeri did not call me to cover his ass, brush me off or jerk my chain. He called to learn, understand, educate and open a door to solutions -- honest, productive, unfortunately rare and much appreciated.

Do I have this right? Taxpayer money spent on private property?

Fox 8 is reporting this morning that Greensboro Parks and Recreation has installed cameras a camera to monitor the infamous Greenway benches.

According to the Guilford County Geographic Information Data Viewer, the benches are on property owned by Greensboro College. If that is correct, I have to ask: Is it appropriate for the taxpayers to fund equipment installations on private property?



I have made a public records request of the Greensboro Public Affairs office to view the pictures taken by this camera.

[Update: Greensboro College granted an easement to the City of Greensboro in June of 2008. Documented here.]
.

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Am I as dumb as I look?

I emailed (Greensboro, NC) News & Record editor Allen Johnson to ask why comments were not allowed on Charles Davenport's column on Sunday. Allen replied that it was the N&R's policy not to enable comments on racially sensitive columns. When I pointed out to him that of the four columns in the past month about race, three of them allowed comments and only Davenport's did not, Allen replied:
"Sorry I wasn't clear. We allow comments on editorials and signed staff columns because they are written by staff people who are able to monitor and participate in those dialogues.
Not so with free-lancers."
That is at odds with the facts too. Columns by freelancer Ed Cone allow comments, as do all of the other freelancers. Even Davenport's column from August allowed comments.

Contrary to Allen's initial explanation, comments are allowed on columns about race. Contrary to Allen's second explanation, comments are allowed on columns by freelancers.

So why were comments not allowed on Davenport's most recent column? Who knows? One thing is sure, it was not for any of the reasons offered by the News & Record's editorial page editor.

This kind of thing is so Greensboro, and so tiresome: Someone in a position of authority is asked a direct question and proceeds by jerking the questioner around. It is so small. Greensboro deserves better.

Update: On his third try, Allen says, contrary to the evidence, it really is that they do not allow comments on columns about race... or sex.

Why Charles Davenport, Jr. is insulated from comments at the News & Record

I emailed (Greensboro, NC) News & Record editor Allen Johnson to ask why comments were allowed on every column, editorial and letter on Sunday except for Charles Davenport Jr.'s. Here is the entirety of his reply:
"We as a general policy don't enable comments on racially sensitive content because the comments tend to get ugly and out of hand."
Update: The facts collide with Johnson's explanation. In the past month, there have been three editorials about race, each had comments enabled.
I could find no other columns about race in the past month in which comments were NOT enabled. Davenport's appears to be the only one.

Update II: Allen offers as a subsequent explanation that the N&R does not allow comments on columns by freelancers, also contrary to the facts, as documented here.

Update II: On his third try, Allen says, contrary to the examples above, it really is that they do not allow comments on columns about race... or sex. 

I love you, Greensboro

May this serve us well.

Monday, September 07, 2009

Big Brother's anonymous little brothers

In an unsigned gawd-awful piece of reporting, in which the author makes a number of unattributed assertions*, the (Greensboro, NC) News & Record reports that unnamed "bench advocates put in a camera bought with private money" to photograph people on the Greenway benches.

What? Who are these people with a camera trained on public benches? Who is collecting the photographs it takes and what are they doing with them? Are city representatives among the "bench advocates" and have they lent some sort of quasi official sanction to this vigilante surveillance?

I have emailed N&R reporter Amanda Lehmert and editor John Robinson and asked them to clarify.

(*In addition to the unnamed "bench advocates," the story also asserts, without attribution or explanation, that the words inscribed on the benches are "words that mean much to Warnersville residents," and that the unnamed "folks involved want to keep those benches beside Warnersville.")

Update: Amanda informs me it was Jeri Rowe who wrote the piece. I have emailed him asking for comment too.

Sunday, September 06, 2009

What the? Charles Davenport insulated from criticism?

Earlier, I commented on Charles Davenport's silly and superficial column in today's (Greensboro, NC) News & Record.

This evening, I went back to Davenport's column at the News & Record to see what, if anything, readers had to say about it in the comments. But comments are not enabled on Davenport's column. They are on Allen Johnson's column; George Will's column; the guest editorial and the paper's unsigned editorial, In fact, every one of today's News & Record columns has comments enabled -- except for Davenport's.

Strange.

.

The left are like Nazis. Meaningless drivel from Charles Davenport

Ed Cone brings to our attention a column by Charles Davenport in this week's (Greensboro, NC) News & Record in which Devenport says that a lot of what modern American Nazis want sounds a lot like what American liberals want.

Yawn.

A lot of what the American National Socialists want also sounds a lot like what modern conservatives want, including:

- Prohibiting abortion
- The right to bear arms
- Withdrawal from the United Nations
- An end to welfare
- Reestablishment of the nuclear family

To paraphrase Davenport, if not for the their unsavory perspective on some other things, many -- perhaps most -- conservatives would subscribe to the agenda.

And there you have it. A superficial comparison no more a commentary on the American right than Davenport's comparison to the American left.

Davenport's shtick as the perpetual divider of all observation to antipodal left or right is tired and increasingly useless.

As I said, "yawn."

More local "Medicare good/government health insurance bad" nonsense

One of Ayn Rand's central themes in "Atlas Shrugged" is that adherence to reason is the highest measure of human life. As several of her characters explain and illustrate, if your "thinking" has you maintaining contradictory propositions, then one of your premises is wrong. "A is A," as she writes; A cannot be A at one moment then B at another.

Medicare is government health insurance. So, if you insist that you are against government health insurance and then use Medicare as an example of a good alternative to government health care, you are engaged in the very broken thinking that Ayn Rand described as despicable and dangerous. You are abandoning your mind.

I haven't finished "Atlas Shrugged" yet, so I do not know if reason wins or if the world falls to the mindless mystics. In our current health care debate, it is abundantly clear where reason is being abandoned.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...