GREENSBORO, NC -- I like the idea of a performing arts center downtown, I don't like that
the location at the top of the list of the citizens' task force (the
YWCA site) is being rejected in favor of another location and justified
with suspect explanations.
Start with the math: The City says the proposed site, while $10 million more costly than the YWCA site, will offer more
income from 250 VIP parking spaces. Their published projections assumed
those would be 100% occupied at each event and that there would be 180
events per year -- a figure they originally attributed to a consultant's
study. That was false. The consultant's study, as the City now admits,
anticipated 149 events per year. The City explains the "error" by saying
they "blended" (their word) the consultant's number with a projection of 220 events
made by city staff. That 220, however, includes 50 rehearsal and load-in
days, events for which there will be no audiences to pay for VIP parking.
Can we not, as a City, approach this decision with honesty?
If this parking revenue falls short, taxpayers will be on the hook to make up the shortfall.
That's not all. Not included in the City's calculations of "increased"
parking revenue at the proposed site are things that will deduct from
that revenue:
1. Loss of revenues from the property taxes currently collected on those
properties when they become public property.
2. Loss of revenues from the city-owned parking spaces currently on that
block.
3. I'm not sure, but I can't seem to find that their calculations
include demolition of the buildings on the property.
4. The cost of tearing down the War Memorial Stadium (which the City
relies on in their projections to force events to the new GPAC).
Finally, who are the stockholders of the corporate entities from which
the City will be buying the properties? Council agenda items often
include detail about the people behind the corporations with whom the
City is being asked to do business. There is no such list attached to
the proposal to purchase the corporate-owned properties at the proposed
location.
No comments:
Post a Comment